[PATCH] usb/gadget: at91sam9g20 fix end point max packet size

[plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)]

On 10:05 Tue 10 May     , Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:50:38PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 19:43 Tue 10 May     , Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > > 
> > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > 
> > > >on 9g20 they are the same as the 9261
> > > 
> > > >Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> > > >---
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c |    2 +-
> > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > >diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
> > > >index 9b7cdb1..41dc093 100644
> > > >--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
> > > >+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
> > > >@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static int __init at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > 	}
> > > > 	/* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */
> > > >-	if (cpu_is_at91sam9260()) {
> > > >+	if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) {
> > > 
> > >    These shouldn't be used in the drivers at all.
> > Sorry this is a bug fix for the current rc and 2.6.38 and older stable tree
> 
> How could I apply this to the tree for the .40 release then?
it's also the case these patch apply from kernel v2.6.26 to above

for the 2.6.40 we will rewrite the soc init so we may chane this in .40 or .41

Best Regards,
J.