From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] clean up VFS dentry_hash (mis)behavior
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:06:05 +0200
Message-ID: <20110511100605.GA30350@lst.de>
References: <1305002616-16782-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:57887 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754190Ab1EKQCS (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 May 2011 12:02:18 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1305002616-16782-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

The whole series looks good to me, but I think life would be a lot
easier for many filesystem if we didn't even bother to push down
the calls for filesystems that don't need it.

You can skip it for XFS with my ACK if you want.