From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dylan Distasio <interzone@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID5 -> RAID6 conversion, please help
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:29:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110511132935.0438143a@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimYWfT_Vr7ZUnNUhOqW2JOyLHHNQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 10 May 2011 21:04:29 -0400 Dylan Distasio <interzone@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's possible I did use different versions but I thought I had
> upgraded both of them right before the reshapes. Sorry if this is an
> elementary question, but does writing the 2nd parity block always to
> the last drive instead of rotating it increase the odds of a total
> loss of the array since the one specific drive always has the 2nd
> parity block?
No. The only possibly impact is a performance impact, and even that would be
hard to quantify.
The reason that parity is rotated is to avoid a 'hot disk'. Every update has
to write the parity block and if they are all on one disk then every write
will generate a write to that one disk.
Because of the way md implements RAID6, every write involves either a read or
a write to every device, so there is no real saving in rotating parity.
I think (but am open to being corrected) that rotating parity is only
important for RAID6 if the code implements 'subtraction' as well as
'addition' for the Q syndrome (which md doesn't) and if you have at least 5
drives, and you probably wouldn't notice until you get to 7 or more drives.
... so it might make sense to make mdadm default to converting to the -6
layout...
You can request it with "--layout=preserve".
>
> If so, do you think normalizing would be worth the risk of something
> going wrong with that operation? I'm just trying to get a feel for
> how much of a difference this makes.
Not worth the risk.
NeilBrown
>
>
> > mdadm first converts the RAID5 to RAID6 in an instant atomic operation which
> > results in the "-6" layout. It then starts a restriping process which
> > converts the layout.
> >
> > If you end up with a -6 layout then something when wrong starting the
> > restriping process.
> >
> > Maybe you used different version of mdadm? There have probably been bugs in
> > some versions..
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-10 23:15 RAID5 -> RAID6 conversion, please help Peter Kovari
2011-05-10 23:31 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-10 23:39 ` Steven Haigh
2011-05-11 0:21 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-11 0:38 ` Dylan Distasio
2011-05-11 0:47 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-11 1:04 ` Dylan Distasio
2011-05-11 3:29 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-05-11 0:08 ` Peter Kovari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110511132935.0438143a@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=interzone@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.