[PATCH] [RFC] USB: fsl_udc_core: fix build-failure for ARM

[gregkh@suse.de (Greg KH)]

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:39:54AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:00:05AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Commit
> > 
> > 	09ba0de (USB: fsl_udc_core: prepare for SoCs with BE registers and descriptors)
> > 
> > introduced two function pointers _fsl_readl and _fsl_writel in an #ifdef
> > CONFIG_PPC32 block and used then unconditionally in fsl_udc_probe.
> > To make the driver compile again this use has to be protected by
> > an #ifdef, too. Moreover ARM doesn't have flush_dcache_range so this
> > is #ifdefed out, too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm unsure about getting rid of the flush_dcache_range. If powerpc needs
> > a flush ARM probably does, too, no?
> > If so, what it the right thing to do? Implement flush_dcache_range for
> > ARM (just wrapping flush_dcache_page?)?
> As Russell seem to be OK with the #ifdef, can you please take this
> patch?

Ick, no.

> >  drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c |    4 ++++
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > index 999eafe..47152e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > @@ -1333,8 +1333,10 @@ static void ch9getstatus(struct fsl_udc *udc, u8 request_type, u16 value,
> >  	/* Fill in the reqest structure */
> >  	*((u16 *) req->req.buf) = cpu_to_le16(tmp);
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
> >  	/* flush cache for the req buffer */
> >  	flush_dcache_range((u32)req->req.buf, (u32)req->req.buf + 8);
> > +#endif

Come on, we don't have ifdefs in .c files for a reason, surely there is
a better fix for this some other way?

thanks,

greg k-h