From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:04:32 +0200 From: Richard Cochran Message-ID: <20110512170432.GA4659@domain.hid> References: <20110409184122.GA11908@domain.hid> <20110409185503.GB11908@domain.hid> <4DA0B580.4070602@domain.hid> <4DA0B878.9010106@domain.hid> <20110410065250.GA28869@domain.hid> <4DA192E0.2090802@domain.hid> <20110414164248.GA4725@domain.hid> <4DCB23D6.9010706@domain.hid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DCB23D6.9010706@domain.hid> Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] arm ixp: more trouble with recent xenomai List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:03:34AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > the issue on ixp looks like the last one to be fixed on arm. If you have > time, could you try the following program? It makes a very basic test, > but not having a big-endian ixp at end, I am wondering about very basic > assumptions...: ~> armeb-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc -Wall arm.c arm.c: In function 'f': arm.c:7: warning: control reaches end of non-void function arm.c: In function 'g': arm.c:13: warning: control reaches end of non-void function and then # ./a.out f: ffffffff g: ffffffff > If you do not have time, do you agree for a revert of the KUSER_TSC code > to the one we had before, and which is working for you? I sorry about not getting back about this. I have had crunch trying to meet a deadline, but now that is over. Tomorrow I'm on the road, but next week looks good for IXP testing. And thanks, thanks, for all your good work, Richard