From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, balbir@in.ibm.com,
jweiner@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.cz, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, yinghan@google.com
Subject: + memcg-fix-zone-congestion.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:25:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105130618.p4D6IAfb030287@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
memcg: fix zone congestion
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
memcg-fix-zone-congestion.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: memcg: fix zone congestion
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
ZONE_CONGESTED should be a state of global memory reclaim. If not, a busy
memcg sets this and give unnecessary throttoling in wait_iff_congested()
against memory recalim in other contexts. This makes system performance
bad.
I'll think about "memcg is congested!" flag is required or not, later.
But this fix is required first.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Acked-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~memcg-fix-zone-congestion mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~memcg-fix-zone-congestion
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -937,7 +937,8 @@ keep_lumpy:
* back off and wait for congestion to clear because further reclaim
* will encounter the same problem
*/
- if (nr_dirty == nr_congested && nr_dirty != 0)
+ if (scanning_global_lru(sc) &&
+ nr_dirty == nr_congested && nr_dirty != 0)
zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
free_page_list(&free_pages);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com are
memcg-fix-zone-congestion.patch
memcg-fix-zone-congestion-fix.patch
mm-remove-unused-zone_idx-variable-from-set_migratetype_isolate.patch
mm-increase-reclaim_distance-to-30.patch
mm-introduce-wait_on_page_locked_killable.patch
x86mm-make-pagefault-killable.patch
mm-mem-hotplug-fix-section-mismatch-setup_per_zone_inactive_ratio-should-be-__meminit.patch
mm-mem-hotplug-recalculate-lowmem_reserve-when-memory-hotplug-occur.patch
mm-mem-hotplug-update-pcp-stat_threshold-when-memory-hotplug-occur.patch
mm-mem-hotplug-update-pcp-stat_threshold-when-memory-hotplug-occur-fix.patch
mm-convert-vma-vm_flags-to-64-bit.patch
mm-add-__nocast-attribute-to-vm_flags.patch
fremap-convert-vm_flags-to-unsigned-long-long.patch
procfs-convert-vm_flags-to-unsigned-long-long.patch
oom-replace-pf_oom_origin-with-toggling-oom_score_adj.patch
oom-replace-pf_oom_origin-with-toggling-oom_score_adj-update.patch
mm-mmu_gather-rework.patch
powerpc-mmu_gather-rework.patch
sparc-mmu_gather-rework.patch
s390-mmu_gather-rework.patch
arm-mmu_gather-rework.patch
sh-mmu_gather-rework.patch
ia64-mmu_gather-rework.patch
um-mmu_gather-rework.patch
mm-now-that-all-old-mmu_gather-code-is-gone-remove-the-storage.patch
mm-powerpc-move-the-rcu-page-table-freeing-into-generic-code.patch
mm-extended-batches-for-generic-mmu_gather.patch
lockdep-mutex-provide-mutex_lock_nest_lock.patch
mm-remove-i_mmap_lock-lockbreak.patch
mm-convert-i_mmap_lock-to-a-mutex.patch
mm-revert-page_lock_anon_vma-lock-annotation.patch
mm-improve-page_lock_anon_vma-comment.patch
mm-use-refcounts-for-page_lock_anon_vma.patch
mm-convert-anon_vma-lock-to-a-mutex.patch
mm-optimize-page_lock_anon_vma-fast-path.patch
mem-hotplug-call-isolate_lru_page-with-elevated-refcount.patch
mem-hwpoison-fix-page-refcount-around-isolate_lru_page.patch
mm-strictly-require-elevated-page-refcount-in-isolate_lru_page.patch
vmscan-change-shrink_slab-interfaces-by-passing-shrink_control.patch
vmscan-change-shrink_slab-interfaces-by-passing-shrink_control-fix.patch
vmscan-change-shrink_slab-interfaces-by-passing-shrink_control-fix-2.patch
vmscan-change-shrinker-api-by-passing-shrink_control-struct.patch
vmscan-change-shrinker-api-by-passing-shrink_control-struct-fix.patch
vmscan-change-shrinker-api-by-passing-shrink_control-struct-fix-2.patch
mm-fail-gfp_dma-allocations-when-zone_dma-is-not-configured.patch
mm-delete-non-atomic-mm-counter-implementation.patch
mm-move-enum-vm_event_item-into-a-standalone-header-file.patch
memcg-count-the-soft_limit-reclaim-in-global-background-reclaim.patch
memcg-add-the-soft_limit-reclaim-in-global-direct-reclaim.patch
memcg-add-stats-to-monitor-soft_limit-reclaim.patch
memcg-add-stats-to-monitor-soft_limit-reclaim-v2.patch
memcg-add-stats-to-monitor-soft_limit-reclaim-v2-fix.patch
memcg-add-stats-to-monitor-soft_limit-reclaim-v2-fix-2.patch
add-the-pagefault-count-into-memcg-stats.patch
add-the-pagefault-count-into-memcg-stats-fix.patch
memcg-remove-pointless-next_mz-nullification-in-mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim.patch
memcg-mark-init_section_page_cgroup-properly.patch
memcg-fix-off-by-one-when-calculating-swap-cgroup-map-length.patch
memcg-move-page-freeing-code-out-of-lock.patch
maintainers-add-mm-page_cgroupc-into-memcg-subsystem.patch
memcg-reclaim-memory-from-nodes-in-round-robin-order.patch
memcg-reclaim-memory-from-nodes-in-round-robin-fix.patch
memcg-reclaim-memory-from-nodes-in-round-robin-fix-2.patch
memcg-fix-get_scan_count-for-small-targets.patch
reply other threads:[~2011-05-13 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105130618.p4D6IAfb030287@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.