From: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>
To: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
Cc: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com,
"Hervé Commowick" <hcommowick@exosec.fr>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
"Ben Hutchings" <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
"Apollon Oikonomopoulos" <apoikos@gmail.com>,
chronidev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 01:56:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110515225653.GA17342@tty.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110514190423.GA2264@nik-comp.lan>
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:04:23PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Nicolas, thanks for further report, it contradicts my theory that
> problem occured somewhere during 2.6.32.16. Now I think I know why
> several of my other machines running 2.6.32.x for long time didn't
> crashed:
>
> I checked bugzilla entry for (I believe the same) problem here:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16991
I don't think that that bug is related, I for one haven't seen any
backtrace that is similar to the above or relevant to divide by zero.
> and Peter Zijlstra asked there, whether reporters systems were running
> some RT tasks. Then I realised that all of my four crashed boxes were
> pacemaker/corosync clusters and pacemaker uses lots of RT priority
> tasks. So I believe this is important, and might be reason why other
> machines seem to be running rock solid - they are not running any RT
> tasks. It also might help with hunting this bug. Is somebody of You
> also running some RT priority tasks on inflicted systems, or problem
> also occured without it?
No, no RT tasks here. The boxes in my case were just running a lot of
kvm processes.
Regards,
Faidon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-15 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 8:26 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes? Nikola Ciprich
2011-04-28 18:34 ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-04-29 10:02 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-04-30 9:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-04-30 11:22 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-04-30 11:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-04-30 12:32 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-04-30 12:02 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-04-30 15:57 ` Greg KH
2011-04-30 16:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-04-30 16:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-04-30 18:14 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-04-30 17:39 ` Faidon Liambotis
2011-04-30 20:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-05-14 19:04 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-05-14 20:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-05-14 20:59 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-14 23:13 ` Nicolas Carlier
2011-05-15 22:56 ` Faidon Liambotis [this message]
2011-05-16 6:49 ` Apollon Oikonomopoulos
2011-06-28 2:25 ` john stultz
2011-06-28 5:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-06-28 6:19 ` Apollon Oikonomopoulos
2011-07-06 6:15 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-12 1:18 ` MINOURA Makoto / 箕浦 真
2011-07-12 1:40 ` john stultz
2011-07-12 2:49 ` MINOURA Makoto / 箕浦 真
2011-07-12 4:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-07-15 0:35 ` john stultz
2011-07-15 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 18:03 ` john stultz
2011-07-15 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 17:59 ` john stultz
2011-07-21 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-21 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-21 12:50 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-07-21 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-21 18:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-21 19:32 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-08-25 18:56 ` Faidon Liambotis
2011-08-30 22:38 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-09-04 23:26 ` Faidon Liambotis
2011-10-23 18:31 ` Ruben Kerkhof
2011-10-23 22:07 ` Greg KH
2011-10-25 22:44 ` john stultz
2011-10-25 23:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-12-02 23:45 ` Greg KH
2011-12-03 0:02 ` john stultz
2011-12-03 1:02 ` Greg KH
2011-12-03 7:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-12-05 16:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-26 18:21 ` Ruben Kerkhof
2011-07-21 19:25 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-07-21 19:37 ` john stultz
2011-07-21 19:53 ` john stultz
2011-05-06 3:12 ` [stable] " Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-13 22:08 ` Nicolas Carlier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110515225653.GA17342@tty.gr \
--to=paravoid@debian.org \
--cc=apoikos@gmail.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=chronidev@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hcommowick@exosec.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.