From: Alan <alanbluetooth@AiAware.com>
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Does any one recognise this protocol? is it RF_COMM
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:15:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105171715.47064.alanbluetooth@aiaware.com> (raw)
I am trying to write an OS driver for some propeitary hardware.
I have hit brick wall and need to go back and check what I know so far and
turn over the rocks on the bits I hoped I could ignore.
I am wondering if I made faulty guess early on. hence this question.
What protocol is this? Can it be RF_COMM ?
below is an edited extract of SnoppyPro logs from the windows software talking
to the real physical device.
My question is what protocol are all the wrappers.
I beleieve I identified HCI-ACL / L2CAp/ UNK / Proprietary.
The Unk one is probably something standard. As I can feed the proprietary part
into an RF_COMM socket under linux and the device responds as if I am the
windows machine. I thook that to mean Windows was talking RF_COMM.
Howver when I have unix software pretend be the device and listen( ) the
accept( ) never returns if it is the winodw software talking to me, but does
when it is my linux software talking to my enulated on linux device.
I can post full hcidump of the failure to connect if you indicate what
settings are intelligible to you, Im finding raw the most informative as i
can compare it to Snopypro logs....
But expect people who knows things would understand the gobbledegooked
output modes better.
The snoopy pro logs are at the USB level(?), and contain one extra (internal)
layer of protocol data I do not undertsand. I think it is RF_COMM
Typical packets
Physical devices packet sent to Windows
113 in up 0x82 28.093 28.093 00
TransferBuffer: 0x0000002b (43) length
pre 0000: 2b 20 27 00 23 00 41 00 09 ef 3f
wrap 0000: 7e[1f 00](61) 24:ac:18:25:80:00 => 00:00:00:00:00:00
cmnd 0000: 02 00 00 04 70 00 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 40
Windows PC Packet sent to Device
122 out down 0x02 28.140 28.140 00
TransferBuffer: 0x00000024 (36) length
pre 0000: 2b 20 20 00 1c 00 8c 00 0b ff 2f 00
wrap 0000: 7e[17 00](69) 00:00:00:00:00:00 => 01:00:00:00:00:00
cmnd 0000: 01 02 76 65 72 0d 0a 86
wrap and cmnd lines are the Device specific protocol burried in what look like
lower layers. My LinuxSoftware emulates the Windows software by injecting the
packets starting at 7E up the second last byte, into an RF_COMM socket.
What I think I know
Im pretty sure the 2b 20 20 00 is
Protocol: “Core_V4.0.pdf” Figure 5.2: HCI ACL Data Packet p429
and 1c 00 8c 00
is L2CAP [size and channel ID].
Does anyone recognise a protocol runnign on L2CAP that looks like this
09 ef 3f Data 40 for inbound packets and
0b ff 2f 00 Data 86 for outbound packets
Here are the same packets dumped RAW for Linux Software talking
physical devices.
(I cant get packets for windw softwware talking emulated device as the conect
fails. Thats the problem)
Note there are binary differences in both the L2CAP and RFCOMM parts.
Most worrying to me is the missing 0.
> 02 2B 20 27 00 23 00 40 00 09 EF 3F 7E 1F 00 61 24 AC 18 25
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 04 70 00 01 00 00 00 00 01
00 00 00 40
Linux RFComm packet.
< 02 2B 20 1F 00 1B 00 4D 00 0B EF 2F 7E 17 00 69 00 00 00 00
00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 02 76 65 72 0D 0A 9A
Any idea why the differences or where there is a reasonable document on what
those RF_COMM bytes mean.
Im probably goign to have to go deep enough to understand the connect process.
Alan
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-17 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 7:15 Alan [this message]
2011-05-17 17:30 ` Does any one recognise this protocol? is it RF_COMM James Steele
2011-05-19 3:13 ` Alan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105171715.47064.alanbluetooth@aiaware.com \
--to=alanbluetooth@aiaware.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.