All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Hans Rosenfeld" <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Robert Richter" <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/8] x86, xsave: rework of extended state handling, LWP support
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:02:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518180224.GA24932@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110517113020.GA13475@elte.hu>

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:23:05AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > FYI, the bits in tip:x86/xsave crash on boot on an AMD X2 testbox:
> > 
> > > Full crashlog and kernel config attached. I've excluded x86/save from 
> > > tip:master for now.
> > 
> > this issue has been fixed a few weeks ago.
> > 
> > Are there any plans to include x86/xsave into tip:master again?
> 
> Regarding the LWP bits, that branch was indeed excluded because of that crash, 
> while re-checking the branch today i noticed at least one serious design error 
> in it, which makes me reconsider the whole thing:

Independend of all the concerns and useful comments regarding LWP ...
it seems to me that patches 1-7 are still of use (cleaning up the
save/restore code making it more maintainable).

Wouldn't it make sense to add patches 1-7 to a branch that is tested
with linux-next to find potential regressions?


Andreas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-09 19:14 [RFC 0/8] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:14 ` [RFC 1/8] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:14 ` [RFC 2/8] x86, xsave: rework " Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:14 ` [RFC 3/8] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave signal frame setup Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:14 ` [RFC 4/8] x86, xsave: remove unused code Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:14 ` [RFC 5/8] x86, xsave: more cleanups Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:15 ` [RFC 6/8] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:15 ` [RFC 7/8] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-09 19:15 ` [RFC 8/8] x86, xsave: remove lazy allocation of xstate area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 0/8] x86, xsave: rework of extended state handling, LWP support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 1/8] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 2/8] x86, xsave: rework " Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 3/8] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave signal frame setup Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 4/8] x86, xsave: remove unused code Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 5/8] x86, xsave: more cleanups Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 6/8] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 7/8] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-23 15:27   ` [RFC v2 8/8] x86, xsave: remove lazy allocation of xstate area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-24 11:39     ` Brian Gerst
2011-03-29 14:17       ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-03-29 15:27         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-03-30 13:11           ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 0/8] x86, xsave: rework of extended state handling, LWP support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-07  7:23             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-07 15:30               ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-07 16:08                 ` [RFC v4 6/8] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-07 16:08                 ` [RFC v4 8/8] x86, xsave: remove lazy allocation of xstate area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-13 10:58                 ` [PATCH] x86, xsave: fix non-lazy allocation of the xsave area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-13 23:21                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-15 16:47                     ` [PATCH 1/1] " Hans Rosenfeld
2011-05-16 19:10               ` [RFC v3 0/8] x86, xsave: rework of extended state handling, LWP support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-05-17 11:30                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17 15:22                   ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-05-18 11:22                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 13:51                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18  8:16                   ` Joerg Roedel
2011-05-18 10:59                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 18:02                   ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 1/8] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 2/8] x86, xsave: rework " Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 3/8] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave signal frame setup Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 4/8] x86, xsave: remove unused code Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 5/8] x86, xsave: more cleanups Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 6/8] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 7/8] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-06 22:06             ` [tip:x86/xsave] " tip-bot for Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-05 15:50           ` [RFC v3 8/8] x86, xsave: remove lazy allocation of xstate area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-04-06 22:06             ` [tip:x86/xsave] " tip-bot for Hans Rosenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110518180224.GA24932@alberich.amd.com \
    --to=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.