All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Add sysfs knob to control size of memory for drivers
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:36:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518183638.GA8887@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105182009.55813.Martin@lichtvoll.de>

Hi!

> > > OK, there are no comments, so my understanding is that everyone is
> > > fine with this patch and I can add it to my linux-next branch.
> > 
> > Actually no, I don't like it. Yes, knob might be useful for debugging,
> > but having it as part of official kernel interface...
> 
> Well I and people with similar setups it is actually quite useful. It 
> makes the difference between does hibernate *every time* versus does not 
> hibernate sometimes. And I don't see why it can't go again, when the issue 
> is taken care of elsewise in the future. I think that autotuning / drivers 
> allocating their memory via whatnot is better, but until such a mechanism 
> is agreed, developed and included in official kernel I do think that this 
> knob does help.

Yes, autotuning would be better, and yes, knob is useful for you now.

I'd say the knob is for debugging and should go to debugfs somewhere.

> I think missing is some documentation so that the advanced user can figure 
> out this knob.

...so we can easily delete the knob when it is no longer neccessary.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-09 22:59 [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Add sysfs knob to control size of memory for drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-14 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15  8:51   ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-15  8:51     ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-15  9:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15  9:51       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15  9:51       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-16 21:34       ` Nigel Cunningham
2011-05-16 21:34         ` Nigel Cunningham
2011-05-16 23:22         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-16 23:22         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15  9:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-18 17:27   ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-18 18:09     ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-18 18:36       ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-18 18:36       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2011-05-18 20:23         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-18 20:23         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-18 18:09     ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-18 17:27   ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-14 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-09 22:59 Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110518183638.GA8887@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.