From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable] Submit commit 3dea642afd for 2.6.38.stable? Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:27:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20110519002727.GD8697@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46953 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753406Ab1ESA3e (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2011 20:29:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern , James Bottomley Cc: SCSI development list , Luben Tuikov , stable@kernel.org On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:45:15PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > James: > > Your commit 3dea642afd9187728d119fce5c82a7ed9faa9b6a ([SCSI] Revert > "[SCSI] Retrieve the Caching mode page") hasn't been submitted for the > 2.6.38 stable tree. More people are now getting hit with the > underlying problem; see > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35042 > > Do you want to queue your commit to the stable tree, or do you prefer > to wait until the proper repair patch: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130089710431684&w=2 > > has been merged so it can go into the stable tree instead? > > Alan Stern > > P.S.: As of now, the scsi-next tree doesn't show any signs of > reinstating Luben's original commit together with my repair patch. > Does this mean you intend to forget about the original "Retrieve the > Caching mode page" change, or do you intend to merge them for 2.6.41?) James, any ideas? thanks, greg k-h