From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS Tests Punch Hole 1/3 v3] XFS TESTS: Add Punch Hole to FSX
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:42:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519004238.GE32466@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD432FC.5030904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:58:36PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> This patch adds punch hole tests to the fsx
> stress test. The test is performed through
> the fallocate call by randomly choosing to
> use the punch hole flag when running the
> fallocate test. Regions that have
> been punched out should contain zeros, so
> the expected file contents buffer is updated
> to contain zeros when a hole is punched out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> v0 -> v1:
> Corrections to the Makefile have been backed out.
> This patch needs to be applied on top of
> the "xfstests: clean up fallocate configuration tests"
> patch
>
> The punch hole tests can be disabled with the
> -H flag, and will also be disabled if it is
> detected that the filesystem does not support
> punch hole
>
>
> :100644 100644 fe072d3... 8978ef1... M ltp/fsx.c
> ltp/fsx.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ltp/fsx.c b/ltp/fsx.c
> index fe072d3..8978ef1 100644
> --- a/ltp/fsx.c
> +++ b/ltp/fsx.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ int randomoplen = 1; /* -O flag disables it */
> int seed = 1; /* -S flag */
> int mapped_writes = 1; /* -W flag disables */
> int fallocate_calls = 1; /* -F flag disables */
> +int punch_hole_calls = 1; /* -H flag disables */
> int mapped_reads = 1; /* -R flag disables it */
> int fsxgoodfd = 0;
> int o_direct; /* -Z */
> @@ -207,7 +208,8 @@ logdump(void)
> {
> int i, count, down;
> struct log_entry *lp;
> - char *falloc_type[3] = {"PAST_EOF", "EXTENDING", "INTERIOR"};
> + char *falloc_type[4] = {"PAST_EOF", "EXTENDING", "INTERIOR",
> + "PUNCH_HOLE"};
>
> prt("LOG DUMP (%d total operations):\n", logcount);
> if (logcount < LOGSIZE) {
> @@ -791,6 +793,11 @@ dofallocate(unsigned offset, unsigned length)
> {
> unsigned end_offset;
> int keep_size;
> + int max_offset = 0;
> + int max_len = 0;
> + int mode = 0;
> + char *op_name;
> + int punch_hole = 0;
>
> if (length == 0) {
> if (!quiet && testcalls > simulatedopcount)
> @@ -799,11 +806,37 @@ dofallocate(unsigned offset, unsigned length)
> return;
> }
>
> +#ifdef FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
> + if (fallocate_calls && !punch_hole_calls)
> + punch_hole = 0;
> + else if (!fallocate_calls && punch_hole_calls)
> + punch_hole = 1;
> + else
> + punch_hole = random() % 2;
> +
> + /* Keep size must be set for punch hole */
> + if (punch_hole) {
> + keep_size = 1;
> + mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
> + } else
> + keep_size = random() % 2;
> +#else
> keep_size = random() % 2;
> +#endif
Ugh. Can you please separate hole punching out into it's own
function? i.e. do_fallocate() gets renamed to do_preallocate(), and
this new functionality goes into do_hole_punch()? The fact that they
both use the fallocate() system call is no reason for complicating
the logic like this....
> @@ -1426,8 +1489,26 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> if (fallocate(fd, 0, 0, 1) && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> warn("main: filesystem does not support fallocate, disabling");
> fallocate_calls = 0;
> - } else
> + /*
> + * punch hole depends on fallocate,
> + * so turn punch hole off too
> + */
> + punch_hole_calls = 0;
> + } else {
> +#ifdef FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
> + if (fallocate(fd,
> + FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
> + 0, 1) && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + warn("main: filesystem does not support"
> + " fallocate punch hole, disabling");
> + punch_hole_calls = 0;
> + }
> +#else
> + punch_hole_calls = 0;
> +#endif
> +
> ftruncate(fd, 0);
> + }
> }
> #else /* ! FALLOCATE */
> fallocate_calls = 0;
And these functionality tests would probably be better in their own
function, too.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS Tests Punch Hole 1/3 v3] XFS TESTS: Add Punch Hole to FSX
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:42:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519004238.GE32466@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD432FC.5030904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:58:36PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> This patch adds punch hole tests to the fsx
> stress test. The test is performed through
> the fallocate call by randomly choosing to
> use the punch hole flag when running the
> fallocate test. Regions that have
> been punched out should contain zeros, so
> the expected file contents buffer is updated
> to contain zeros when a hole is punched out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> v0 -> v1:
> Corrections to the Makefile have been backed out.
> This patch needs to be applied on top of
> the "xfstests: clean up fallocate configuration tests"
> patch
>
> The punch hole tests can be disabled with the
> -H flag, and will also be disabled if it is
> detected that the filesystem does not support
> punch hole
>
>
> :100644 100644 fe072d3... 8978ef1... M ltp/fsx.c
> ltp/fsx.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ltp/fsx.c b/ltp/fsx.c
> index fe072d3..8978ef1 100644
> --- a/ltp/fsx.c
> +++ b/ltp/fsx.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ int randomoplen = 1; /* -O flag disables it */
> int seed = 1; /* -S flag */
> int mapped_writes = 1; /* -W flag disables */
> int fallocate_calls = 1; /* -F flag disables */
> +int punch_hole_calls = 1; /* -H flag disables */
> int mapped_reads = 1; /* -R flag disables it */
> int fsxgoodfd = 0;
> int o_direct; /* -Z */
> @@ -207,7 +208,8 @@ logdump(void)
> {
> int i, count, down;
> struct log_entry *lp;
> - char *falloc_type[3] = {"PAST_EOF", "EXTENDING", "INTERIOR"};
> + char *falloc_type[4] = {"PAST_EOF", "EXTENDING", "INTERIOR",
> + "PUNCH_HOLE"};
>
> prt("LOG DUMP (%d total operations):\n", logcount);
> if (logcount < LOGSIZE) {
> @@ -791,6 +793,11 @@ dofallocate(unsigned offset, unsigned length)
> {
> unsigned end_offset;
> int keep_size;
> + int max_offset = 0;
> + int max_len = 0;
> + int mode = 0;
> + char *op_name;
> + int punch_hole = 0;
>
> if (length == 0) {
> if (!quiet && testcalls > simulatedopcount)
> @@ -799,11 +806,37 @@ dofallocate(unsigned offset, unsigned length)
> return;
> }
>
> +#ifdef FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
> + if (fallocate_calls && !punch_hole_calls)
> + punch_hole = 0;
> + else if (!fallocate_calls && punch_hole_calls)
> + punch_hole = 1;
> + else
> + punch_hole = random() % 2;
> +
> + /* Keep size must be set for punch hole */
> + if (punch_hole) {
> + keep_size = 1;
> + mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
> + } else
> + keep_size = random() % 2;
> +#else
> keep_size = random() % 2;
> +#endif
Ugh. Can you please separate hole punching out into it's own
function? i.e. do_fallocate() gets renamed to do_preallocate(), and
this new functionality goes into do_hole_punch()? The fact that they
both use the fallocate() system call is no reason for complicating
the logic like this....
> @@ -1426,8 +1489,26 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> if (fallocate(fd, 0, 0, 1) && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> warn("main: filesystem does not support fallocate, disabling");
> fallocate_calls = 0;
> - } else
> + /*
> + * punch hole depends on fallocate,
> + * so turn punch hole off too
> + */
> + punch_hole_calls = 0;
> + } else {
> +#ifdef FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
> + if (fallocate(fd,
> + FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
> + 0, 1) && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + warn("main: filesystem does not support"
> + " fallocate punch hole, disabling");
> + punch_hole_calls = 0;
> + }
> +#else
> + punch_hole_calls = 0;
> +#endif
> +
> ftruncate(fd, 0);
> + }
> }
> #else /* ! FALLOCATE */
> fallocate_calls = 0;
And these functionality tests would probably be better in their own
function, too.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 20:58 [XFS Tests Punch Hole 1/3 v3] XFS TESTS: Add Punch Hole to FSX Allison Henderson
2011-05-18 20:58 ` Allison Henderson
2011-05-19 0:42 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-05-19 0:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110519004238.GE32466@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.