From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li_request()
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:39:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520173946.GB29282@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1105201809320.5226@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:16:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>
> I already did send it as a separate patch series with the version
> description.
What, you mean the -v2 patch series?
But Eric has made further suggestions where you said you might try to
do more work. Or did I misread the mail thread? This is why I hate
it when you reply to the mail thread with an updated patch. It makes
it very hard to figure out what's going on....
So let me rephrase the question: Is -v2 your final answer?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-09 15:57 [PATCH 1/4 v2] ext4: Use schedule_timeout_interruptible() for waiting in lazyinit thread Lukas Czerner
2011-05-09 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] ext4: Remove unnecessary wait_event ext4_run_lazyinit_thread() Lukas Czerner
2011-05-19 19:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 9:09 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-09 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: fix init_itable=n to work as expected for n=0 Lukas Czerner
2011-05-19 19:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 9:21 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-09 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li_request() Lukas Czerner
2011-05-19 20:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 9:27 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-20 16:03 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-20 16:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 17:47 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-20 17:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 16:16 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-20 17:39 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2011-05-20 17:42 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-19 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] ext4: Use schedule_timeout_interruptible() for waiting in lazyinit thread Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110520173946.GB29282@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.