All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x32-abi@googlegroups.com,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: X32 project status update
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:27:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105211727.35985.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinM_=bAjD59=GiKtTvjLtoOs7KCFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
> This is the x32 project status update:
> 
> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
> 

I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically
looks all good, but the system call table appears to
diverge from the x86_64 list for no (documented) reason,
in the calls above 302. Is that intentional?

I can see why you might want to keep the numbers identical,
but if they are already different, why not use the generic
system call table from asm-generic/unistd.h for the new
ABI?

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-21 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-21 15:01 X32 project status update H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 15:27 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-05-21 15:34   ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 16:27     ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 18:55       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-21 19:39         ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 20:01         ` Anvin, H Peter
2011-05-21 23:48           ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-22 20:02             ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-22 21:15               ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-23 16:59   ` Anvin, H Peter
2011-06-17  3:13 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-29 21:29   ` H.J. Lu
2011-11-24 23:58 ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201105211727.35985.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x32-abi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.