From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu
Subject: Re: ptrace_resume->wake_up_process (Was: Ptrace documentation, draft #1)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:23:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110523172352.GA30226@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimaN8U8_sWT_q_ZDZkA51jqWPHkiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > In fact ptrace_resume()->wake_up_process() is obviously wrong anyway,
> > I think the patch below makes sense even for 2.6.40.
>
> Send me a signed-off version with a somewhat cleaned-up commit
> message, and we can make that happen.
Ah, I sent the patch a minute ago.
> Or a pull request ..
Whatever is more convenient for you. If everyone agree with this change,
I'll add it to ptrace branch and send [GIT PULL] tomorrow.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-23 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-15 20:35 Ptrace documentation, draft #1 Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-16 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 15:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 16:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 17:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-18 15:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-18 15:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-19 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-20 18:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-23 12:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 14:10 ` ptrace_resume->wake_up_process (Was: Ptrace documentation, draft #1) Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-23 17:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-25 20:08 ` [GIT PULL] PTRACE_KILL/wakeup fix for v2.6.40 Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 17:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] Was: ptrace_resume->wake_up_process Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: ptrace_resume() shouldn't wake up !TASK_TRACED thread Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] signal: sys_pause() should check signal_pending() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110523172352.GA30226@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.