From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933594Ab1EWTkb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 15:40:31 -0400 Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33443 "EHLO out5.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932209Ab1EWTk3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 15:40:29 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: eSn1fogDLvY+bLv6MgtJs/8moBWqf5rurwdJJdQdj1DO 1306179628 Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:41:32 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Vikram Narayanan Cc: Randy Dunlap , lkml , torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Documentation: update GregKH links Message-ID: <20110523194132.GA20700@kroah.com> References: <20110523115542.dcf23f5d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110523120125.2d15da7e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110523190926.GA18092@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:03:43AM +0530, Vikram Narayanan wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01:25PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> From: Vikram Narayanan > >> > >> Fixed the broken links in the SubmittingPatches file. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vikram Narayanan > >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > >> --- > >> --- > >>  Documentation/SubmittingPatches |    9 +++++---- > >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> --- linux-2.6.39-git6.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > >> +++ linux-2.6.39-git6/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > >> @@ -714,10 +714,11 @@ Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submiss > >>     > >> > >>  Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer". > >> -   > >> -   > >> -   > >> -   > >> +   > >> +   > >> +   > >> +   > >> +   > >> > > > > I have no real objection to this, but the original links are not broken > > at all, and still work just fine for me here, don't they for you as > > well? > At the time of submission of this patch, It didn't work for me. (It > returned http://storm.he.net/cgi-bin/error404) > That's why I searched for the updated links and sent a patch. > But, It works fine now. > Now, its your wish, whether or not to use this patch :) Odd, anyway, your new links are a bit more descriptive, so again, no objection from me. greg k-h