Re: [GIT PULL] USB patches for next merge window

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [110523 11:11]:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:15:15AM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:14:38 +0300
> > Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > a gentle ping here too. Without this we will have regressions on
> > > ehci/ohci as the pm_runtime patches have gone in via Samuel.
> > > 
> > Does this mean that those regressions happened already when those
> > patches were made if there is pull request dependency?
> 
> not really, no.
> 
> > Remember bisectability is important. And very important if you are
> > bisecting something else but which is dependent on this as then you
> > could mark wrong good/bad points or not able to determine.
> 
> True, true... I just wanted to avoid conflicts as much as possible so
> arch/arm/*omap*/ goes through Tony, and drivers/mfd/* goes through
> Samuel.
> 
> pm_rutime and hwmod conversion aren't really that tightly coupled. As
> long as the arch code is in place, we can do pm_runtime at any time. Not
> sure if it's true the other way around. But one thing is for sure, if
> this pull request isn't taken, then I guess clocks won't enable on
> omap-usbhs...

Looks like these patches are missing acks from Benoit and Paul?
I'd rather not pull them in without the acks. Note that we have
a very short merge window this time, so let's see if we can still
get them in.

Regards,

Tony