From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE Cleanup
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:14:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105262214.44529.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDEC006.30701@linux.intel.com>
On Thursday 26 May 2011 22:03:02 Darren Hart wrote:
> Yeah, this wasn't clear to me either. And my question in 2/2 still
> stands - what is the goal of the overhead factor?
I think the thinking was that the more software you have installed to begin
with the more user data you're likely to need to store. Personally I think it
would be simpler if we just set some additional overhead as an absolute value
rather than a factor - if it needs to be different per image type then it
easily can be.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 6:38 [RFC 0/2] IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE Cleanup Saul Wold
2011-05-24 6:38 ` [RFC 1/2] " Saul Wold
2011-05-26 18:04 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-26 18:28 ` Saul Wold
2011-05-26 19:54 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-26 20:55 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-26 21:01 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-26 21:03 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-26 21:13 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-26 21:15 ` Saul Wold
2011-05-26 21:31 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-26 21:14 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2011-05-27 4:07 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-27 4:29 ` Saul Wold
2011-05-27 5:22 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-02 1:46 ` Tom Rini
2011-05-24 6:38 ` [RFC 2/2] image_types: add IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE Saul Wold
2011-05-26 18:04 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-26 18:22 ` Saul Wold
2011-05-26 20:58 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105262214.44529.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.