From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:52:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] SPEAr320: Add pwm support In-Reply-To: <20110530114405.GD23771@pengutronix.de> References: <4DE353F8.9040207@st.com> <20110530114405.GD23771@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <201105301352.55570.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 30 May 2011, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Sascha sent a patchset for something similar earlier. > > But don't know what happened to it. > > Nothing yet, unfortunately. It was a straight forward implementation > which basically implements the existing pwm functions and adds > register/unregister functions. > Bill Gatliff posts a pwm framework since 2008. I wasn't aware of his > patches by the time I wrote my pwm layer. Bills patches target more the > motor controller use case and are (in my opinion) too complicated. I > can't agree on his approach, but didn't want to go with competing > patches either. > > As Bills patches still didn't make it into the kernel Maybe it's time > to respin my version. Yes, I think that would be good, then we can add the new SPEAr320 pwm driver to the new subsystem as a first example, and move the other drivers over after that. Arnd