All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	indan@nul.nu
Subject: Re: execve-under-ptrace API bug (was Re: Ptrace documentation, draft #3)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:56:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530135623.GC4739@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110530084906.GA11773@htj.dyndns.org>

On 05/30, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> A problem is that by the time de-threading is in progress, it's
> already too deep and there's no way back and the exec'ing thread has
> to wait for completion in uninterruptible sleeps - ie. it expects
> de-threading to finish in finite amount of time and to achieve that it
> basically sends SIGKILL to all other threads.  If we introduce a trap
> in de-threading itself, we can easily end up with an unkillable
> task.

"unkillable" is not the problem, afaics. But the new trap is problematic,
we do not want the TASK_TRACED task holding the mutexes taken by the
callers of de_thread.

> 1. Don't allow more than one thread in the same group enter exec(2)
>    path at all.

This is already done, see do_execve()->prepare_bprm_creds().
cred_guard_mutex serializes exec. Btw, probably this allows us to do
more cleanups/simplifications in do_execve() paths.

> 2. Add another trap point right before de-threading commences.

See above.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-30 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 19:23 Ptrace documentation, draft #3 Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-25 14:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-30  3:08   ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30  3:28   ` execve-under-ptrace API bug (was Re: Ptrace documentation, draft #3) Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30  8:49     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-30 11:40       ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 14:27         ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 16:42           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-30 23:43             ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-31 13:51               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-02 10:57                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-02 14:59                   ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-06-02 15:12                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 18:11           ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 13:56       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-30 13:49     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-30 13:35 ` Ptrace documentation, draft #3 Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110530135623.GC4739@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.