From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: About the oprofile tools and related profiling tools Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:02:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20110531160256.GB31659@dumpdata.com> References: <20110531143542.GK14641@dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Lv, Hui" Cc: George Dunlap , "dunlapg@gmail.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:42:38PM +0800, Lv, Hui wrote: > Thanks Konrad and George! > > I have tried Mike Petullo's patched pvops domain0 and xenoprofile on it can work. > > But I did not get the right sample results of HVM guest (No samples obtained). So I guess, something should be wrong from hypervisor part in profiling HVM guest. > > So did anyone successfully profile the HVM based guest using this patch? You might want to email Mike to ask that. > > Anyway, this patch is very useful. Thanks Mike Petullo's work. :)