From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] S3C6410: Support 800MHz operation in cpufreq Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:02:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20110608140238.GB7204@redhat.com> References: <1307540955-10086-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307540955-10086-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:49:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > At least some newer S3C6410 silicon supports operation up to 800MHz rather > than just 667MHz. Unfortunately I don't have access to any of documentation > of this other than some running systems, add a new cpufreq table entry for > this based on the behaviour of those systems. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > --- > > Kukjin already indicated on several occasions that he was happy with > this change but it never seems to get applied or an actual ack. applied, thanks. Dave From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davej@redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:02:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] [CPUFREQ] S3C6410: Support 800MHz operation in cpufreq In-Reply-To: <1307540955-10086-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1307540955-10086-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20110608140238.GB7204@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:49:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > At least some newer S3C6410 silicon supports operation up to 800MHz rather > than just 667MHz. Unfortunately I don't have access to any of documentation > of this other than some running systems, add a new cpufreq table entry for > this based on the behaviour of those systems. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > --- > > Kukjin already indicated on several occasions that he was happy with > this change but it never seems to get applied or an actual ack. applied, thanks. Dave