From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: SAMSUNG: Change platform driver
 for SMDKs
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:49:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20110610094920.GC26436@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1307606950-8310-1-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com>
 <1307606950-8310-4-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com>
 <BANLkTinUk6CRdh8mYAk7fbd9Ga6iBRfcaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <000a01cc273e$49dc4610$dd94d230$@com>
 <BANLkTikswO-5LOreJq=OXutya_CzYUkh1g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikswO-5LOreJq=OXutya_CzYUkh1g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56:45PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com> wrote:

> > I only focused on S5PV210 and S5PV310.
> > I didn't consider s3c and s5p series.
> > In the next version, I will delete it.

> Though if then everything works fine with system and internal DMA,
> maybe it is better to assign platform_name string at runtime from some
> module parameter, and leaving the default to normal system DMA ?

If iDMA is always a better choice on CPUs that support it then the
cpu_is_() macros might be a good way to make the selection?