All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:47:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110610181719.GA30330@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim7a9uhH_K6sw4YdqWB6frT+HUqqQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> [2011-06-08 20:25:00]:

> Hi Kamalesh,
> 
> I'm unable to reproduce the results you describe.  One possibility is
> load-balancer interaction -- can you describe the topology of the
> platform you are running this on?
> 
> On both a straight NUMA topology and a hyper-threaded platform I
> observe a ~4% delta between the pinned and un-pinned cases.
> 
> Thanks -- results below,
> 
> - Paul
> 
> 
(snip)

Hi Paul,

That box is down. I tried running the test on the 2-socket quad-core with 
HT and I was not able to reproduce the issue. CPU idle time reported with 
both pinned and un-pinned case was ~0. But if we create a cgroup hirerachy 
of 3 levels above the 5 cgroups, instead of the current hirerachy where all
the 5 cgroups created under /cgroup. The Idle time is seen on 2-socket 
quad-core (HT) box.

				-----------
				| cgroups |
				-----------
				     |
				-----------
				| level 1 |
				-----------
				     |
				-----------
				| level 2 |
				-----------
				     |
				-----------
				| level 3 |
				-----------
			      /   /   |   \     \
			     /	 /    |    \     \
			cgrp1  cgrp2 cgrp3 cgrp4 cgrp5


Un-pinned run
--------------

Average CPU Idle percentage 24.8333%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 75.1667%
Bandwidth of Group 1 = 8.3700 i.e = 6.2900% of non-Idle CPU time 75.1667%
|...... subgroup 1/1	= 49.9900	i.e = 3.1400% of 6.2900% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 1/2	= 50.0000	i.e = 3.1400% of 6.2900% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 2 = 8.3700 i.e = 6.2900% of non-Idle CPU time 75.1667%
|...... subgroup 2/1	= 49.9900	i.e = 3.1400% of 6.2900% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 2/2	= 50.0000	i.e = 3.1400% of 6.2900% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 3 = 16.6500 i.e = 12.5100% of non-Idle CPU time 75.1667%
|...... subgroup 3/1	= 25.0000	i.e = 3.1200% of 12.5100% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/2	= 24.9100	i.e = 3.1100% of 12.5100% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/3	= 25.0800	i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5100% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/4	= 24.9900	i.e = 3.1200% of 12.5100% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 4 = 29.3600 i.e = 22.0600% of non-Idle CPU time 75.1667%
|...... subgroup 4/1	= 12.0200	i.e = 2.6500% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/2	= 12.3800	i.e = 2.7300% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/3	= 13.6300	i.e = 3.0000% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/4	= 12.7000	i.e = 2.8000% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/5	= 12.8000	i.e = 2.8200% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/6	= 11.9600	i.e = 2.6300% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/7	= 12.7400	i.e = 2.8100% of 22.0600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/8	= 11.7300	i.e = 2.5800% of 22.0600% Groupsnon-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 5 = 37.2300 i.e = 27.9800% of non-Idle CPU time 75.1667%
|...... subgroup 5/1	= 47.7200	i.e = 13.3500%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/2	= 5.2000	i.e = 1.4500% 	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/3	= 6.3600	i.e = 1.7700% 	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/4	= 6.3600	i.e = 1.7700%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/5	= 7.9800	i.e = 2.2300%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/6	= 5.1800	i.e = 1.4400%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/7	= 7.4900	i.e = 2.0900%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/8	= 5.9200	i.e = 1.6500%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/9	= 7.7500	i.e = 2.1600%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/10	= 4.8100	i.e = 1.3400%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/11	= 4.9300	i.e = 1.3700%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/12	= 6.8900	i.e = 1.9200%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/13	= 6.0700	i.e = 1.6900%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/14	= 6.5200	i.e = 1.8200%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/15	= 5.9200	i.e = 1.6500%	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/16	= 6.6400	i.e = 1.8500% 	of 27.9800% Groups non-Idle CPU time

Pinned Run
----------

Average CPU Idle percentage 0%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 100%
Bandwidth of Group 1 = 6.2700 i.e = 6.2700% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 1/1	= 50.0100	i.e = 3.1300% of 6.2700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 1/2	= 49.9800	i.e = 3.1300% of 6.2700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 2 = 6.2700 i.e = 6.2700% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 2/1	= 50.0000	i.e = 3.1300% of 6.2700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 2/2	= 49.9900	i.e = 3.1300% of 6.2700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 3 = 12.5300 i.e = 12.5300% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 3/1	= 25.0100	i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5300% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/2	= 25.0000	i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5300% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/3	= 24.9900	i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5300% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/4	= 24.9900	i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5300% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 4 = 25.0200 i.e = 25.0200% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 4/1	= 12.5100	i.e = 3.1300% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/2	= 12.5000	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/3	= 12.5000	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/4	= 12.5000	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/5	= 12.4900	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/6	= 12.4900	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/7	= 12.4900	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/8	= 12.4800	i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0200% Groups non-Idle CPU time
 
 
Bandwidth of Group 5 = 49.8800 i.e = 49.8800% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 5/1	= 49.9600	i.e = 24.9200% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/2	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/3	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/4	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/5	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/6	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/7	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/8	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/9	= 6.2400	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/10	= 6.2500	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/11	= 6.2400	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/12	= 6.2400	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/13	= 6.2400	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/14	= 6.2400	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/15	= 6.2300	i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/16	= 6.2400	i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8800% Groups non-Idle CPU time

Modified script
---------------

#!/bin/bash

NR_TASKS1=2
NR_TASKS2=2
NR_TASKS3=4
NR_TASKS4=8
NR_TASKS5=16

BANDWIDTH=1
SUBGROUP=1
PRO_SHARES=0
MOUNT_POINT=/cgroups/
MOUNT=/cgroups/
LOAD=./while1
LEVELS=3

usage()
{
	echo "Usage $0: [-b 0|1] [-s 0|1] [-p 0|1]"
	echo "-b 1|0 set/unset  Cgroups bandwidth control (default set)"
	echo "-s Create sub-groups for every task (default creates sub-group)"
	echo "-p create propotional shares based on cpus"
	exit
}
while getopts ":b:s:p:" arg
do
	case $arg in
	b)
		BANDWIDTH=$OPTARG
		shift
		if [ $BANDWIDTH -gt 1 ] && [ $BANDWIDTH -lt  0 ]
		then
			usage
		fi
		;;
	s)
		SUBGROUP=$OPTARG
		shift
		if [ $SUBGROUP -gt 1 ] && [ $SUBGROUP -lt 0 ]
		then
			usage
		fi
		;;
	p)
		PRO_SHARES=$OPTARG
		shift
		if [ $PRO_SHARES -gt 1 ] && [ $PRO_SHARES -lt 0 ]
		then
			usage
		fi
		;;

	*)

	esac
done
if [ ! -d $MOUNT ]
then
	mkdir -p $MOUNT
fi
test()
{
	echo -n "[ "
	if [ $1 -eq 0 ]
	then
		echo -ne '\E[42;40mOk'
	else
		echo -ne '\E[31;40mFailed'
		tput sgr0
		echo " ]"
		exit
	fi
	tput sgr0
	echo " ]"
}
mount_cgrp()
{
	echo -n "Mounting root cgroup "
	mount -t cgroup -ocpu,cpuset,cpuacct none $MOUNT_POINT &> /dev/null
	test $?
}

umount_cgrp()
{
	echo -n "Unmounting root cgroup "
	cd /root/
	umount $MOUNT_POINT
	test $?
}

create_hierarchy()
{
	mount_cgrp
	cpuset_mem=`cat $MOUNT/cpuset.mems`
	cpuset_cpu=`cat $MOUNT/cpuset.cpus`
	echo -n "creating hierarchy of levels $LEVELS "
	for (( i=1; i<=$LEVELS; i++ ))
	do
		MOUNT="${MOUNT}/level${i}"
		mkdir $MOUNT
		echo $cpuset_mem > $MOUNT/cpuset.mems
		echo $cpuset_cpu > $MOUNT/cpuset.cpus
		echo "-1" > $MOUNT/cpu.cfs_quota_us
		echo "500000" > $MOUNT/cpu.cfs_period_us
		echo -n " .."
	done
	echo " "
	echo $MOUNT
	echo -n "creating groups/sub-groups ..."
	for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))
	do
		mkdir $MOUNT/$i
		echo $cpuset_mem > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.mems
		echo $cpuset_cpu > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.cpus
		echo -n ".."
		if [ $SUBGROUP -eq 1 ]
		then
			jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
			for (( j=1; j<=$jj; j++ ))
			do
				mkdir -p $MOUNT/$i/$j
				echo $cpuset_mem > $MOUNT/$i/$j/cpuset.mems
				echo $cpuset_cpu > $MOUNT/$i/$j/cpuset.cpus
				echo -n ".."
			done
		fi
	done
	echo "."
}

cleanup()
{
	pkill -9 while1 &> /dev/null
	sleep 10
	echo -n "Umount groups/sub-groups .."
	for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))
	do
		if [ $SUBGROUP -eq 1 ]
		then
			jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
			for (( j=1; j<=$jj; j++ ))
			do
				rmdir $MOUNT/$i/$j
				echo -n ".."
			done
		fi
		rmdir $MOUNT/$i
		echo -n ".."
	done
	cd $MOUNT
	cd ../
	for (( i=$LEVELS; i>=1; i-- ))
	do
		rmdir level$i
		cd ../	
	done
	echo " "
	umount_cgrp
}

load_tasks()
{
	for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))
	do
		jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
		shares="1024"
		if [ $PRO_SHARES -eq 1 ]
		then
			eval shares=$(echo "$jj * 1024" | bc)
		fi
		echo $shares > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.shares
		for (( j=1; j<=$jj; j++ ))
		do
			echo "-1" > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.cfs_quota_us
			echo "500000" > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.cfs_period_us
			if [ $SUBGROUP -eq 1 ]
			then

				$LOAD &
				echo $! > $MOUNT/$i/$j/tasks
				echo "1024" > $MOUNT/$i/$j/cpu.shares

				if [ $BANDWIDTH -eq 1 ]
				then
					echo "500000" > $MOUNT/$i/$j/cpu.cfs_period_us
					echo "250000" > $MOUNT/$i/$j/cpu.cfs_quota_us
				fi
			else
				$LOAD & 
				echo $! > $MOUNT/$i/tasks
				echo $shares > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.shares

				if [ $BANDWIDTH -eq 1 ]
				then
					echo "500000" > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.cfs_period_us
					echo "250000" > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.cfs_quota_us
				fi
			fi
		done
	done
	echo "Capturing idle cpu time with vmstat...."
	vmstat 2 100 &> vmstat_log &
}

pin_tasks()
{
	cpu=0
	count=1
	for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))
	do
		if [ $SUBGROUP -eq 1 ]
		then
			jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
			for (( j=1; j<=$jj; j++ ))
			do
				if [ $count -gt 2 ]
				then
					cpu=$((cpu+1))
					count=1
				fi
				echo $cpu > $MOUNT/$i/$j/cpuset.cpus
				count=$((count+1))
			done
		else
			case $i in
			1)
				echo 0 > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.cpus;;
			2)
				echo 1 > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.cpus;;
			3)
				echo "2-3" > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.cpus;;
			4)
				echo "4-6" > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.cpus;;
			5)
				echo "7-15" > $MOUNT/$i/cpuset.cpus;;
			esac
		fi
	done
	
}

print_results()
{
	eval gtot=$(cat sched_log|grep -i while|sed 's/R//g'|awk '{gtot+=$7};END{printf "%f", gtot}')
	for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))	
	do
		eval temp=$(cat sched_log_$i|sed 's/R//g'| awk '{gtot+=$7};END{printf "%f",gtot}')
		eval tavg=$(echo "scale=4;(($temp / $gtot) * $1)/100 " | bc)
		eval avg=$(echo  "scale=4;($temp / $gtot) * 100" | bc)
		eval pretty_tavg=$( echo "scale=4; $tavg * 100"| bc) # F0r pretty format
		echo "Bandwidth of Group $i = $avg i.e = $pretty_tavg% of non-Idle CPU time $1%"
		if [ $SUBGROUP -eq 1 ]
		then
			jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
			for (( j=1; j<=$jj; j++ ))
			do
				eval tmp=$(cat sched_log_$i-$j|sed 's/R//g'| awk '{gtot+=$7};END{printf "%f",gtot}')
				eval stavg=$(echo "scale=4;($tmp / $temp) * 100" | bc)
				eval pretty_stavg=$(echo "scale=4;(($tmp / $temp) * $tavg) * 100" | bc)
				echo -n "|"
				echo -e "...... subgroup $i/$j\t= $stavg\ti.e = $pretty_stavg% of $pretty_tavg% Groups non-Idle CPU time"
			done
		fi
		echo " "
		echo " "
	done
}

capture_results()
{
	cat /proc/sched_debug > sched_log
	lev=""
	for (( i=1; i<=$LEVELS; i++ ))
	do
		lev="$lev\/level${i}"	
	done
	pkill -9 vmstat 
	avg=$(cat vmstat_log |grep -iv "system"|grep -iv "swpd"|awk ' { if ( NR != 1) {id+=$15 }}END{print (id/(NR-1))}')

	rem=$(echo "scale=2; 100 - $avg" |bc)
	echo "Average CPU Idle percentage $avg%"	
	echo "Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle $rem%" 
	for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))
	do
		cat sched_log |grep -i while1|grep -i "$lev\/$i" > sched_log_$i
		if [ $SUBGROUP -eq 1 ]
		then
			jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
			for (( j=1; j<=$jj; j++ ))
			do
				cat sched_log |grep -i while1|grep -i "$lev\/$i\/$j" > sched_log_$i-$j
			done
		fi
	done
	print_results $rem
}

create_hierarchy
pin_tasks

load_tasks
sleep 60
capture_results
cleanup
exit


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-10 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-03  9:28 [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 01/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:14   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-10  8:32     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-11  7:55       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  8:13         ` Paul Turner
2011-05-11  8:45           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-11  8:59             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 02/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:17   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 03/15] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:18   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 04/15] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:20   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:37     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16  9:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16  9:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:32     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-17 15:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18  7:16         ` Paul Turner
2011-05-18 11:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 05/15] sched: add a timer to handle CFS bandwidth refresh Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:21   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:27     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:56     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 06/15] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage and charge against bandwidth Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:22   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:25     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:59     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-17 15:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18  7:02         ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 07/15] sched: expire invalid runtime Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:22   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-16 11:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 11:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 08/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local runtime Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:23   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-16 15:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 16:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 09/15] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:24   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:24     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 10/15] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:24   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-17 13:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18  7:18     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 11/15] sched: prevent interactions between throttled entities and load-balance Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:26   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:11     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 12/15] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:27   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:10     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:28 ` [patch 13/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:27   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  7:56   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:09     ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03  9:29 ` [patch 14/15] sched: return unused runtime on voluntary sleep Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:28   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03  9:29 ` [patch 15/15] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-05-10  7:29   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11  9:09     ` Paul Turner
2011-06-07 15:45 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-08  3:09   ` Paul Turner
2011-06-08 10:46   ` Vladimir Davydov
2011-06-08 16:32     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-09  3:25       ` Paul Turner
2011-06-10 18:17         ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2011-06-14  0:00           ` Paul Turner
2011-06-15  5:37             ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-21 19:48               ` Paul Turner
2011-06-24 15:05                 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-07 11:00                 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 14:54                 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 15:20                 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 19:22                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-08 15:15                     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-09 12:31                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-09 13:26                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-12 10:17                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-12 12:35                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13  4:15                             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13  5:03                               ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13  5:05                                 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13  9:39                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 11:28                                   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 14:07                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 16:21                                       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 16:33                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 17:41                                           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 16:36                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 17:54                                           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:03                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:12                                               ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:07                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:19                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:28                                               ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:30                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:35                                                   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-15 17:55                                                     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-15 21:48                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 17:51                                                         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-20  0:38                                                           ` Venki Pallipadi
2011-09-20 11:09                                                             ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-20 13:56                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 14:04                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:55                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 17:34                                                         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-13 14:19                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:01                                 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:23                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-16  8:14                                     ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16  8:28                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:35                                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-16  8:22                   ` Paul Turner
2011-06-14 10:16   ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-14  6:58 ` [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Hu Tao
2011-06-14  7:29   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-14  7:44     ` Hu Tao
2011-06-15  8:37     ` Hu Tao
2011-06-16  0:57       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-16  9:45         ` Hu Tao
2011-06-17  1:22           ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-17  6:05             ` Hu Tao
2011-06-17  6:25             ` Paul Turner
2011-06-17  9:13               ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-18  0:28                 ` Paul Turner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110610181719.GA30330@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.