diff for duplicates of <20110611073517.GB2517@ubuntu>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d0c9b9e..0aa2420 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:41:38AM +0300, Amir G. wrote:
 > >> > from reading the documents.
 > >
 > > First up let me say that I'm not intending to support writeable
-> > _external_ origins with multisnap.  This will come as a suprise to
+> > _external_ origins with multisnap. ?This will come as a suprise to
 > > many people, but I don't think we can resolve the dual requirements to
 > > efficiently update many, many snapshots when a write occurs _and_ make
 > > those snapshots quick to delete (when you're encouraging people to
@@ -55,8 +55,3 @@ more than a copy-on-write scheme.  Arguably it's better to do the copy
 only once we know they want to commit to it.
 
 - Joe
-
---
-lvm-devel mailing list
-lvm-devel@redhat.com
-https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/lvm-devel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index c566741..b7684e2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,16 +5,9 @@
  "ref\020110610101142.GA10144@ubuntu\0"
  "ref\0BANLkTi=0N7QXRvFgjHUJXBi0x=668ahXXA@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: LVM vs. Ext4 snapshots (was: [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots)\0"
+ "Subject\0LVM vs. Ext4 snapshots (was: [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots)\0"
  "Date\0Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:35:17 +0100\0"
- "To\0Amir G. <amir73il@users.sourceforge.net>\0"
- "Cc\0tytso@mit.edu"
-  Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  lvm-devel@redhat.com
-  linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
-  Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
- " linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0lvm-devel@redhat.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:41:38AM +0300, Amir G. wrote:\n"
@@ -34,7 +27,7 @@
  "> >> > from reading the documents.\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > First up let me say that I'm not intending to support writeable\n"
- "> > _external_ origins with multisnap. \302\240This will come as a suprise to\n"
+ "> > _external_ origins with multisnap. ?This will come as a suprise to\n"
  "> > many people, but I don't think we can resolve the dual requirements to\n"
  "> > efficiently update many, many snapshots when a write occurs _and_ make\n"
  "> > those snapshots quick to delete (when you're encouraging people to\n"
@@ -73,11 +66,6 @@
  "more than a copy-on-write scheme.  Arguably it's better to do the copy\n"
  "only once we know they want to commit to it.\n"
  "\n"
- "- Joe\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "lvm-devel mailing list\n"
- "lvm-devel@redhat.com\n"
- https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/lvm-devel
+ - Joe
 
-22ae7d65db66844631a1ba47f461b0751643d75f5bc5c812e76db4d30cc03c74
+0efa14db8c849e7d18ca6847254a6bd904a293ec41ea1734aa2600d24f5336be
