From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Slusarz Subject: gpu lockup detection and fallback to noaccel Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:18:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20110614211859.GA3687@joi.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Errors-To: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org Hi I have a very rough patchset which adds support for GPU lockup detection and fallback to (more or less) noaccel to xf86-video-nouveau. As the patches are only a proof of concept and needs a lot of work, I would like to know first if this is a desired feature - I don't want to spend a couple of days on patches which will be ignored or rejected with a reason "we don't need it". So, what do you think? Marcin