From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [Patch] dma: remove DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:00:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110616090037.GA10326@cr0.redhat.com> (raw)
git grep shows there are no users in tree, so we can
remove them safely.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 7 -------
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 21 ---------------------
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 72e2384..8e2d816 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -474,13 +474,6 @@ Who: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
----------------------------
-What: DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros
-When: Jun 2011
-Why: DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros were replaced with DMA_BIT_MASK() macros.
-Who: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
-
-----------------------------
-
What: iwlwifi disable_hw_scan module parameters
When: 2.6.40
Why: Hareware scan is the prefer method for iwlwifi devices for
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index ba8319a..dc77808 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -54,27 +54,6 @@ struct dma_map_ops {
#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
-typedef u64 DMA_nnBIT_MASK __deprecated;
-
-/*
- * NOTE: do not use the below macros in new code and do not add new definitions
- * here.
- *
- * Instead, just open-code DMA_BIT_MASK(n) within your driver
- */
-#define DMA_64BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
-#define DMA_48BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(48)
-#define DMA_47BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(47)
-#define DMA_40BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(40)
-#define DMA_39BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(39)
-#define DMA_35BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(35)
-#define DMA_32BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
-#define DMA_31BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(31)
-#define DMA_30BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(30)
-#define DMA_29BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(29)
-#define DMA_28BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(28)
-#define DMA_24BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(24)
-
#define DMA_MASK_NONE 0x0ULL
static inline int valid_dma_direction(int dma_direction)
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 9:00 Américo Wang [this message]
2011-06-16 16:23 ` [Patch] dma: remove DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros FUJITA Tomonori
2011-06-16 20:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-06-24 10:47 ` Koul, Vinod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110616090037.GA10326@cr0.redhat.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.