From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, stse+xen@fsing.rootsland.net
Subject: Re: Re: Linux 3.0-rc1 - what Xen components went in.
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:07:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110616150706.GA6275@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110616T113336.GA.bd449.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:48:20AM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:12:24PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >- Xen block backend. Yes, it is in!
>
> I tried 3.0-rc2 as a Dom0 kernel, but I have problems with the block
> backend support.
> Both Dom0 and DomU are Debian/Testing systems. XEN version is 4.1.0.
>
> The 3.0-rc2 compiled and started without problems, even the DomU
> started. But when I looked at the DomU console I noticed that the
> system had problems with the filesystems. ext3 and ext4 partitions
> produced journal errors and got mounted read only.
Hmm, are barriers somehow being turned on? (They shouldn't). It would
be helpfull if you included the error logs.
>
> Going back to my 2.6.34.8 with xen patches the DomU problems vanished.
So using the older Dom0. Are there any errors/warnings reported by
the frontend? Is there a difference in the dmesg output from the DomU
booted on 2.6.34 vs 3.0?
>
> Here is the XEN configuration part for the DomU block devices:
>
> disk = [ 'phy:mapper/mroot,xvda1,w', 'phy:mapper/mswap,xvda2,w',
> 'phy:mapper/mvar,xvda5,w', 'phy:mapper/msquid,xvda6,w',
> 'phy:mapper/musr,xvda7,w', 'phy:mapper/mhome,xvda8,w' ]
>
that is pretty much how I've it too. Well:
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-xfs,xvda,w', 'phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-ext4,xvdb,w','phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-ext3,xvdc,w', 'phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-swap ,xvdd,w']
I don't try to put disks as partitions. Let me try that. Are the sizes
that xne-blkfront report the same?
> Do I have to change something? The devices are LUKS encrypted LVM
> devices.
Ah, hadn't tried LUKS. What happens if they are _not_ on LUKS?
Let me set up LUKs on my box in the meantime.
>
> The DomU kernel is a 2.6.36.4 vanilla kernel. I noticed that I can’t
> use a newer kernel. Every kernel > 2.6.36 crashes the DomU
> immediatley (I don’t even get a console). The log said that DomU was
> crashing too fast, so it was disabled to avoid loops. This happens
> with 2.6.34.8 as Dom0 kernel and with 3.0-rc2.
Can you boot it with 'earlyprintk=xenboot debug loglevel=10' please?
Are you using a special version of .config? Is it available somewhere?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 16:12 Linux 3.0-rc1 - what Xen components went in Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-01 6:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Joseph Glanville
2011-06-16 9:48 ` Stephan Seitz
2011-06-16 15:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-06-16 17:31 ` Stephan Seitz
2011-06-16 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-30 11:16 ` Stephan Seitz
2011-07-17 15:28 ` Problem with vfb at Xen 4.1 Dom0 ( 3.0.0-5-generic ) Ubuntu 11.10 (alpha 2) Boris Derzhavets
2011-07-18 11:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-18 12:29 ` Boris Derzhavets
2011-07-18 12:40 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-18 13:45 ` Boris Derzhavets
2011-07-18 16:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-19 16:12 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110616150706.GA6275@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stse+xen@fsing.rootsland.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.