From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] proc info restrictions problem
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:42:07 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110618104207.GA13752@albatros> (raw)
Hi,
I'm trying to adapt HARDEN_PROC restrictions to taskstats and proc
connector and stuck with a problem. proc connector is a special
broadcast netlink socket that gathers all proc information (fork, exit,
exec). There is one mechanism to filter the data coming into actual
receiving sockets:
int netlink_broadcast_filtered(..., void (*filter)(sock, skb, data), data)
"sock" is receiving socket, filter answers whether the skb should be
send to "sock".
The thing is a socket has no actual information about what specific task
owns it as it might be owned by multiple tasks simultaneously. So, I
cannot check for PTRACE_MODE_READ as I have only "struct cred*", not
"struct task_struct*". Some LSMs use only cred part of task, but SMACK
already uses some information from task_struct, so changing ptrace and LSM
interface is impossible.
Manual check for {e,r,fs,s}{u,g}id and capabilities via
cap_ptrace_access_check() might not be sufficient because of possible
additional LSM restrictions and policies.
I feel doubt whether ptrace_may_access() may be changed to something
more simple. Both -ow and -grsecurity use changed posix permissions and
gid on procfs files, so maybe just match subject's euid vs. object's uid?
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-18 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-18 10:42 Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-06-18 18:28 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: proc info restrictions problem Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-19 14:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110618104207.GA13752@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.