From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58799)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1QYg8H-0005HC-AB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:11:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1QYg8F-0002RX-9j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:11:21 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1329)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1QYg8E-0002RA-RV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:11:19 -0400
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5KFBHs6002803
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:11:17 -0400
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:11:07 +0200
From: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20110620151107.GE28412@bow.redhat.com>
References: <1308568312-5463-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com>
	<1308568312-5463-3-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com>
	<4DFF3970.8000804@redhat.com>
	<20110620125821.GB28412@bow.redhat.com>
	<4DFF543F.9070205@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DFF543F.9070205@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qxl: add QXL_IO_UPDATE_MEM for guest
 S3&S4 support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: yhalperi@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>What is the difference to one worker->stop() + worker->start() cycle?
> >>
> >
> >ok, stop+start won't disconnect any clients either. But does stop render all waiting commands?
> >I'll have to look, I don't know if it does.
> 
> It does.  This is what qemu uses to flush all spice server state to
> device memory on migration.
> 
> What is the reason for deleting all surfaces?

Making sure all references are dropped to pci memory in devram. We would need to recreate all
the surfaces after reset anyway.

> 
> cheers,
>   Gerd
>