All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Peter Hsiang <Peter.Hsiang@maxim-ic.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Taylor Hutt <thutt@chromium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@chromium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Max98095: Fix logging of hardware revision.
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:10:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110621011038.GA4322@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B2150E1E4418E1438554A300EA5040E40DDEC16D42@ITSVLEX06.it.maxim-ic.internal>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:43:58PM -0700, Peter Hsiang wrote:

> I checked with hardware engineering and was told 0x40=RevA, 0x41=RevB..

> Would a raw value or the use of a 0x3F bit mask be more acceptable?

I don't mind (though it does seem like the high bit isn't part of the
actual data), it was just that it's a common error to assume that die
revisions and package revisions correspond directly.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Peter Hsiang <Peter.Hsiang@maxim-ic.com>
Cc: Taylor Hutt <thutt@chromium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@chromium.org>,
	"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Max98095: Fix logging of hardware revision.
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:10:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110621011038.GA4322@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B2150E1E4418E1438554A300EA5040E40DDEC16D42@ITSVLEX06.it.maxim-ic.internal>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:43:58PM -0700, Peter Hsiang wrote:

> I checked with hardware engineering and was told 0x40=RevA, 0x41=RevB..

> Would a raw value or the use of a 0x3F bit mask be more acceptable?

I don't mind (though it does seem like the high bit isn't part of the
actual data), it was just that it's a common error to assume that die
revisions and package revisions correspond directly.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-21  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20 18:54 [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Max98095: Fix logging of hardware revision Taylor Hutt
2011-06-20 20:06 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-06-20 20:06   ` Liam Girdwood
2011-06-21  0:23 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21  0:23   ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21  0:43   ` Peter Hsiang
2011-06-21  0:43     ` Peter Hsiang
2011-06-21  1:10     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-06-21  1:10       ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 11:55       ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 11:55         ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 14:52         ` Taylor Hutt
2011-06-21 17:10           ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 20:16         ` Peter Hsiang
2011-06-21 20:16           ` Peter Hsiang
2011-06-21 20:48         ` Peter Hsiang
2011-06-21 20:48           ` Peter Hsiang
2011-06-21  3:22   ` Taylor Hutt
2011-06-21 10:06     ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 10:06       ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 23:28 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110621011038.GA4322@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=Peter.Hsiang@maxim-ic.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=olofj@chromium.org \
    --cc=thutt@chromium.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.