From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: P?draig Brady <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: sandy bridge kswapd0 livelock with pagecache
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110621143434.GI9396@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E008784.80107@draigBrady.com>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:59:00PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> On 21/06/11 12:34, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:47:35AM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> >> On 21/06/11 11:39, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:53:02AM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> >>>> I tried the 2 patches here to no avail:
> >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130503811704830&w=2
> >>>>
> >>>> I originally logged this at:
> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712019
> >>>>
> >>>> I can compile up and quickly test any suggestions.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I recently looked through what kswapd does and there are a number
> >>> of problem areas. Unfortunately, I haven't gotten around to doing
> >>> anything about it yet or running the test cases to see if they are
> >>> really problems. In your case, the following is a strong possibility
> >>> though. This should be applied on top of the two patches merged from
> >>> that thread.
> >>>
> >>> This is not tested in any way, based on 3.0-rc3
> >>
> >> This does not fix the issue here.
> >>
> >
> > I made a silly mistake here. When you mentioned two patches applied,
> > I assumed you meant two patches that were finally merged from that
> > discussion thread instead of looking at your linked mail. Now that I
> > have checked, I think you applied the SLUB patches while the patches
> > I was thinking of are;
> >
> > [afc7e326: mm: vmscan: correct use of pgdat_balanced in sleeping_prematurely]
> > [f06590bd: mm: vmscan: correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab]
> >
> > The first one in particular has been reported by another user to fix
> > hangs related to copying large files. I'm assuming you are testing
> > against the Fedora kernel. As these patches were merged for 3.0-rc1, can
> > you check if applying just these two patches to your kernel helps?
>
> These patches are already present in my 2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64 kernel :(
>
While doing a review of patches for unrelated reasons between 2.6.38
and 3.0-rc3, I noted a few patches related to high CPU usage that may
not have made it to the Fedora kernel.
* d527caf2 mm: compaction: prevent kswapd compacting memory to reduce CPU usage
8afdcece mm: vmscan: kswapd should not free an excessive number of pages when balancing small zones
602605a4 mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating free pages
b2eef8c0 mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages for migration
* 929bea7c vmscan: all_unreclaimable() use zone->all_unreclaimable as a name
* afc7e326 mm: vmscan: correct use of pgdat_balanced in sleeping_prematurely
* f06590bd mm: vmscan: correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab
The ones marked * are already in 2.6.38.8 so presumably in the Fedora
kernel as well but worth double checking. Of the remaining patches,
patch 2 is the most relevant to your problem as it was explicitly
targeted at reclaiming during copying large amounts of data.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 9:53 sandy bridge kswapd0 livelock with pagecache Pádraig Brady
2011-06-21 10:39 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-21 10:47 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-21 11:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-21 11:59 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-21 13:07 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-21 14:23 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-22 9:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-22 10:19 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-23 11:46 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-23 13:04 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-23 15:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-23 15:32 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-23 16:59 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-23 19:25 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-24 11:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-24 13:10 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-06-24 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-24 6:33 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-21 14:34 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-06-21 15:29 ` Pádraig Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110621143434.GI9396@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=P@draigBrady.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.