From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: AW: Load increase after memory upgrade? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:46:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20110627134643.GD6978@dumpdata.com> References: <2029813.131309174164862.JavaMail.root@uhura> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2029813.131309174164862.JavaMail.root@uhura> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Carsten Schiers Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:29:24PM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote: > Hi, > > the higher load is neither bound to memory increase nor Xen version, it's the kernel. > Changed at the same time from a Xenified 2.6.34.7 kernel to pvops jeremy's git > stable-2.6.32.x > > Konrad, are you interested? You can see from attached graphic the much higer load > mid 21 to 24. riker (yellow) is using the cards constantly for scanning transponders, > two seem to make use of DMA for that reason... Um, so 2.6.34 to 2.6.32 causes this spike in usage? What is the SWIOTLB (PCI-DMA32) usage between these two kernels and are the drivers (budget_...) the same version?