From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QbCej-000544-By for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:19:18 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2011 07:15:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,432,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="18818968" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.17.113]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2011 07:15:19 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Chris Larson Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:15:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201106271515.18128.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] bitbake: track 'overlayed' recipes X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:19:18 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 24 June 2011 19:15:21 Chris Larson wrote: > Seems sane conceptually, but can we name this something else? > overlayedlist is pretty weak, particularly being it's not a list at > all :) I'd say just overlayed, or overlayed_recipes, or similar. I've changed it to "overlayed" in the poky contrib branch. I can post v2 patches if desired. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre