From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:30:43 +0200 Message-ID: <201106271830.43698.richard@nod.at> References: <20110627161656.688820b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:53499 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756Ab1F0Qaz (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:30:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Jeff Dike , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Am Montag 27 Juni 2011, 17:27:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Changes since 20110624: > uml defconfig builds on x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) fail with: > > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:756: error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this > function) Hmm, "->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()" is the evil doer. Al? Thanks, //richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEiC-0005dN-SD for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:31:00 +0000 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1QbEiB-0008C9-Ft for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:31:00 +0000 From: Richard Weinberger Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:30:43 +0200 References: <20110627161656.688820b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201106271830.43698.richard@nod.at> List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Am Montag 27 Juni 2011, 17:27:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Changes since 20110624: > uml defconfig builds on x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) fail with: > > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:756: error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this > function) Hmm, "->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()" is the evil doer. Al? Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel