From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Liwei <xieliwei@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Re: "ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter"
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:10:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110627191031.GD15703@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinq11kUiCF-ZwC6gk7y3+dDiGAnBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:23:09AM +0800, Liwei wrote:
> On 28 June 2011 01:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Can you attach the full serial log and on the Linux kernel line have
> > 'loglevel=10 debug initcall_debug' please?
>
> See attached.
>
> >
> > Is the serial log when running under 2.6.32 any different? (up to the ACPI interpretter
> > blowing up)? What does the /proc/interrupts look under 2.6.32?
>
> There's too much noise for me to compare, but I think they're more or
> less the same until the the interpreter blows up for 3.0 whereas
> 2.6.32 does not.
Another glance shows:
(2.6.32):
[ 3.502771] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 20 low level)
[ 3.502773] xen: sci override: source_irq=9 global_irq=20 trigger=c polarity=3
[ 3.502775] xen: registering gsi 20 triggering 0 polarity 1
[ 3.502780] alloc irq_desc for 20 on node 0
So it has IRQ 9 mapped to IRQ 20 while in 3.0:
[ 3.803695] xen: --> pirq=7 -> irq=7
[ 3.803699] xen: --> pirq=8 -> irq=8
[ 3.803702] xen: --> pirq=10 -> irq=10
we skip over IRQ 9. We should have gotten something like this:
[ 7.059735] xen_map_pirq_gsi: returning irq 20 for gsi 9
[ 7.064933] xen: --> pirq=20 -> irq=9
But we did not. If you can instrument 'acpi_get_override_irq' to see
at which of the numerous 'return -1' it fails that might narrow down
the issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-27 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-24 18:55 "ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter" Liwei
2011-06-25 12:33 ` Liwei
[not found] ` <20110627133936.GB6978@dumpdata.com>
2011-06-27 15:12 ` Liwei
2011-06-27 16:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-27 16:59 ` Liwei
2011-06-27 17:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-27 18:23 ` Liwei
2011-06-27 18:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-27 19:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-06-27 19:18 ` Liwei
2011-06-27 19:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-27 20:32 ` Liwei
2011-06-27 21:09 ` Liwei
2011-06-28 18:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-28 18:33 ` Liwei
2011-06-28 19:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-28 19:49 ` Liwei
2011-06-28 19:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-28 19:55 ` Liwei
2011-06-28 20:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-29 13:09 ` Liwei
2011-06-29 13:37 ` Liwei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-29 14:23 Konrad Wilk
2011-06-29 15:20 ` Liwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110627191031.GD15703@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xieliwei@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.