From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] serial/8250: move DWAP support to arch/mips Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:48:25 +0200 Message-ID: <201106281248.25230.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1309211120-2803-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1309211120-2803-5-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20110628110642.3517cac8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:58543 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756283Ab1F1Ks2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:48:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110628110642.3517cac8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Jamie Iles , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:45:17 +0200 > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Only one board uses the UPIO_DWAP iotype, and nothing uses > > the UPIO_DWAP32 iotype. It seems much cleaner to handle the > > DWAP quirk as a new port type, and move the serial_out > > accessor into the platform code. If more platforms start > > using the DWAP port, that function can be moved into a > > common location. > > Half of this patch appears to be unrelated work on HUB6 > > Both halves look right but did you accidentally fold two patches > together ? Right, Jamie also pointed this out. When I re-send, I'll use Jamie's version of the patch and make a proper patch for HUB6. Arnd