From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvoI-00041g-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:32:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvoG-0005x8-Aw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:32:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvoF-0005ws-T1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:32:08 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5TEW7OL020899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:32:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:31:54 +0200 From: Alon Levy Message-ID: <20110629143154.GB30873@bow.redhat.com> References: <1309348641-20061-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <1309348641-20061-16-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <4E0B249C.2000300@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E0B249C.2000300@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3] (alon-local) symlink bios out of tree List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: yhalperi@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:11:56PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 06/29/11 13:57, Alon Levy wrote: > >--- > > pc-bios/bios.bin | Bin 131072 -> 26 bytes > > pc-bios/vgabios-qxl.bin | Bin 40448 -> 41 bytes > > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > mode change 100644 => 120000 pc-bios/bios.bin > > mode change 100644 => 120000 pc-bios/vgabios-qxl.bin > > That wasn't intentional, was it? > No, I forgot to delete the file and did email *.. > /me cherry-picked a bunch of patches, I'll go push an updated tree shortly. ok - so I guess I'll wait for that and then send the S3-S4 using ASYNC for the FLUSH_SURFACES patch separately. (I guess I'll call it FLUSH_SURFACES_ASYNC and FLUSH_RELEASE_ASYNC? or just the former ASYNC? > > cheers, > Gerd >