From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: irqbalance segfaults Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:01:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20110630150135.GC19002@dumpdata.com> References: <4E0A596C.1090509@mailinator.com> <4E0A5E7D.6020909@daevel.fr> <4E0B3C88.4090708@mail.theorb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E0B3C88.4090708@mail.theorb.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Mike Wright Cc: "Olivier B." , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:54:00AM -0700, Mike Wright wrote: > On 06/28/2011 04:06 PM, Olivier B. wrote: > >Hi, > > > >it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which > >doesn't exists under Xen PV. > >See the Debian report about that : > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517183 > > > >Ana will package the fix soon for Debian Squeeze (backports ?), but > >which distribution are you using ? > > Follow up: > > I checked and on fedora 14 there exists /proc/irq/0. Distributed When you boot it under Xen? Hm, can you provide the /proc/interrupts contents? > version is irqbalance-0.56-1. > > Perhaps the segfault is a result of something else? Could be. Did you try the patch that was attached to the bugzilla?