From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: adapt delay.h to common implementation Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:21:10 +0200 Message-ID: <201107021321.10786.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1309600754-21217-1-git-send-email-jonas@southpole.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:53973 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751006Ab1GBLVr (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2011 07:21:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1309600754-21217-1-git-send-email-jonas@southpole.se> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jonas Bonn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com, lethal@linux-sh.org On Saturday 02 July 2011 11:59:13 Jonas Bonn wrote: > > Several architectures are using a common delay.h implementation that > appears to have originated with the x86 architecture. This common > implementation is a bit fuller than the current asm-generic version > and has some compile-time checks that should be interesting for all > architectures. > > This patch takes the common delay.h version and replaces the rather > trivial asm-generic version with it. As no architecture was actually > using asm-generic/delay.h, this change is rather innocuous; it will, > however, allow us to switch at least four architectures over to using > the asm-generic version. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn Very nice. Do you want to keep that in your own tree for your convenience, and merge it along with your architecture, or do you prefer me to take them into the asm-generic tree? If you want to add them to your tree, please add my Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann