From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stoexhubfe01.domain01.net ([83.145.59.140]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe56a-0004fO-60 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:51:56 +0200 Received: from localhost (193.235.91.228) by stoexhubfe01.domain01.net (10.12.10.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:48:06 +0200 From: Anders Darander Organization: ChargeStorm AB To: Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:48:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-2-amd64; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <1309869522.2410.0.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1309869522.2410.0.camel@phil-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201107051448.10772.anders@chargestorm.se> X-GFI-SMTP-Submission: 1 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/1] Fix external module compilations X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:51:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit * Phil Blundell Phil Blundell [07/05/11 02:38 PM]: > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 14:05 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: > > When compiling an external module, the compilation errors out, when > > scripts/basic/fixdep and later on scripts/mod/modpost is being requested. > > The removal of 'make -C $kerneldir _mrproper_scripts' fixes these > > problems. > > It is a bit sad that these sorts of changes need to be done twice. Is > there a compelling reason why meta-oe needs to maintain its own version > of kernel.bbclass rather than sharing it with oe-core? Yes, it is certainly a sad state. The primary difference seems to be some changes in the uImage-related code, and that meta-oe has some initramfs-support in its kernel.bbclass. Can someone with deeper knowledge comment on this? I guess that it shouldn't be any real problems in getting the initramfs support code merged into oe- core. What about the differences in the uImage code? (I haven't really looked into the differences). Cheers, Anders