From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Jarosz, Sebastian" <sebastian.jarosz@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch]acpi: add missing _OSI strings -- resend
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:08:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110705150853.53e00c17.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309757000.15392.221.camel@sli10-conroe>
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:23:20 +0800
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> Last post (Jun 14 ) is lost, resend.
>
>
> Linux supports some optional features, but it should notify BIOS about them
> in _OSI method. Currently Linux doesn't notify any, which might make such
> features not work because BIOS doesn't know about them.
>
This is a bit vague. Are any machines actually fixed or improved by
this change? Is so, can we please see a full description of the
behaviour change?
Thanks.
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -1083,7 +1083,13 @@ struct osi_setup_entry {
> bool enable;
> };
>
> -static struct osi_setup_entry __initdata osi_setup_entries[OSI_STRING_ENTRIES_MAX];
> +static struct osi_setup_entry __initdata
> + osi_setup_entries[OSI_STRING_ENTRIES_MAX] = {
> + {"Module Device", true},
> + {"Processor Device", true},
> + {"3.0 _SCP Extensions", true},
> + {"Processor Aggregator Device", true},
> +};
>
> void __init acpi_osi_setup(char *str)
> {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 5:23 [patch]acpi: add missing _OSI strings -- resend Shaohua Li
2011-07-04 13:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-07-05 22:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-07-06 0:29 ` Shaohua Li
2011-07-06 12:50 ` Jarosz, Sebastian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110705150853.53e00c17.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.jarosz@intel.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.