From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gregkh@suse.de (Greg KH)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:02:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 07/15] pxa25x_udc: drop support for udc_command
In-Reply-To: <20110708215442.GG31978@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
References: <1309871321-11305-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<1309871321-11305-8-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<20110705134615.GJ2820@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
	<20110708213428.GA31866@kroah.com>
	<20110708215442.GG31978@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Message-ID: <20110708220258.GA29651@suse.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > > > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality.
> > > > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code.
> > > 
> > > looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on
> > > parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches
> > > straight ? Here's my Acked-by:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > 
> > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer
> > instead.
> 
> But why ? They only touch drivers/usb/gadget/pxa*.c

All 15 patches?  No they don't they touch all sorts of things.

> Would it be enough if Grant would Ack them ?

Sure, but it would be easier if Grant took them all, right?

thanks,

greg k-h