From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: lockdep circular locking error (rcu_node_level_0 vs rq->lock)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:19:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711231932.GB20367@redhat.com> (raw)
I was doing an install in a kvm guest, which wedged itself at the end.
This was in the host dmesg.
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.0.0-rc6+ #91
-------------------------------------------------------
libvirtd/5720 is trying to acquire lock:
(rcu_node_level_0){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff814c6c12>] rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp.part.5+0x3f/0x60
but task is already holding lock:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8105408e>] sched_ttwu_pending+0x39/0x5b
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[<ffffffff8108dfc5>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[<ffffffff814cf0ab>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73
[<ffffffff8104663a>] __task_rq_lock+0x5e/0x8b
[<ffffffff8105506d>] wake_up_new_task+0x46/0x10d
[<ffffffff8105a1c9>] do_fork+0x231/0x331
[<ffffffff81010c80>] kernel_thread+0x75/0x77
[<ffffffff814abe82>] rest_init+0x26/0xdc
[<ffffffff81d3dbc2>] start_kernel+0x401/0x40c
[<ffffffff81d3d2c4>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3
[<ffffffff81d3d3ca>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x102/0x111
-> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[<ffffffff8108dfc5>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[<ffffffff814cf238>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4f/0x89
[<ffffffff81054e3d>] try_to_wake_up+0x2e/0x1db
[<ffffffff81054ffc>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x14
[<ffffffff81079008>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x3d
[<ffffffff81045010>] __wake_up_common+0x4d/0x83
[<ffffffff8104634e>] __wake_up+0x39/0x4d
[<ffffffff810c3cd6>] rcu_report_exp_rnp+0x52/0x8b
[<ffffffff810c4f18>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x1d0/0x231
[<ffffffff8115202a>] rcu_read_unlock+0x26/0x28
[<ffffffff8115465d>] __d_lookup+0x103/0x115
[<ffffffff8114b9eb>] walk_component+0x1b1/0x3af
[<ffffffff8114bd8a>] link_path_walk+0x1a1/0x43b
[<ffffffff8114c148>] path_lookupat+0x5a/0x2af
[<ffffffff8114d222>] do_path_lookup+0x28/0x97
[<ffffffff8114d658>] user_path_at+0x59/0x96
[<ffffffff81145214>] sys_readlinkat+0x33/0x95
[<ffffffff81145291>] sys_readlink+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff814d5c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #1 (sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq.lock){......}:
[<ffffffff8108dfc5>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[<ffffffff814cf238>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4f/0x89
[<ffffffff81046337>] __wake_up+0x22/0x4d
[<ffffffff810c3cd6>] rcu_report_exp_rnp+0x52/0x8b
[<ffffffff810c4f18>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x1d0/0x231
[<ffffffff8115202a>] rcu_read_unlock+0x26/0x28
[<ffffffff8115465d>] __d_lookup+0x103/0x115
[<ffffffff8114b9eb>] walk_component+0x1b1/0x3af
[<ffffffff8114bd8a>] link_path_walk+0x1a1/0x43b
[<ffffffff8114c148>] path_lookupat+0x5a/0x2af
[<ffffffff8114d222>] do_path_lookup+0x28/0x97
[<ffffffff8114d658>] user_path_at+0x59/0x96
[<ffffffff81145214>] sys_readlinkat+0x33/0x95
[<ffffffff81145291>] sys_readlink+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff814d5c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #0 (rcu_node_level_0){..-.-.}:
[<ffffffff8108d7e5>] __lock_acquire+0xa2f/0xd0c
[<ffffffff8108dfc5>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[<ffffffff814cf0ab>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73
[<ffffffff814c6c12>] rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp.part.5+0x3f/0x60
[<ffffffff810c4ed6>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x18e/0x231
[<ffffffff810463f4>] rcu_read_unlock+0x26/0x28
[<ffffffff8104b6db>] cpuacct_charge+0x58/0x61
[<ffffffff81052f18>] update_curr+0x107/0x134
[<ffffffff8105349b>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xc9/0x1d0
[<ffffffff81049775>] check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x6e
[<ffffffff81053f5e>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x7b/0x111
[<ffffffff81054050>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.76+0x5c/0x61
[<ffffffff8105409e>] sched_ttwu_pending+0x49/0x5b
[<ffffffff810540be>] scheduler_ipi+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff810224f6>] smp_reschedule_interrupt+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff814d6b33>] reschedule_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff813fcc18>] rcu_read_unlock+0x26/0x28
[<ffffffff813fe308>] sock_def_readable+0x88/0x8d
[<ffffffff81497760>] unix_stream_sendmsg+0x264/0x2ff
[<ffffffff813f83c4>] sock_aio_write+0x112/0x126
[<ffffffff8114093b>] do_sync_write+0xbf/0xff
[<ffffffff81141012>] vfs_write+0xb6/0xf6
[<ffffffff81141206>] sys_write+0x4d/0x74
[<ffffffff814d5c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
rcu_node_level_0 --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(&p->pi_lock);
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(rcu_node_level_0);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by libvirtd/5720:
#0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8105408e>] sched_ttwu_pending+0x39/0x5b
stack backtrace:
Pid: 5720, comm: libvirtd Not tainted 3.0.0-rc6+ #91
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff814c51cf>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
[<ffffffff8108d7e5>] __lock_acquire+0xa2f/0xd0c
[<ffffffff8107e905>] ? sched_clock_local+0x12/0x75
[<ffffffff814c6c12>] ? rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp.part.5+0x3f/0x60
[<ffffffff8108dfc5>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[<ffffffff814c6c12>] ? rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp.part.5+0x3f/0x60
[<ffffffff8108adab>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.10+0x59/0x62
[<ffffffff814cf0ab>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73
[<ffffffff814c6c12>] ? rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp.part.5+0x3f/0x60
[<ffffffff814cf855>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x47/0x54
[<ffffffff814c6c12>] rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp.part.5+0x3f/0x60
[<ffffffff810c4e00>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0xb8/0x231
[<ffffffff810c4ed6>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x18e/0x231
[<ffffffff810463f4>] rcu_read_unlock+0x26/0x28
[<ffffffff8104b6db>] cpuacct_charge+0x58/0x61
[<ffffffff81052f18>] update_curr+0x107/0x134
[<ffffffff8105349b>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xc9/0x1d0
[<ffffffff81049775>] check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x6e
[<ffffffff81053f5e>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x7b/0x111
[<ffffffff81054050>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.76+0x5c/0x61
[<ffffffff8105409e>] sched_ttwu_pending+0x49/0x5b
[<ffffffff810540be>] scheduler_ipi+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff810224f6>] smp_reschedule_interrupt+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff814d6b33>] reschedule_interrupt+0x13/0x20
<EOI> [<ffffffff8107e905>] ? sched_clock_local+0x12/0x75
[<ffffffff810c4d91>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x49/0x231
[<ffffffff8108dea5>] ? lock_release+0x1b1/0x1de
[<ffffffff813fcc18>] rcu_read_unlock+0x26/0x28
[<ffffffff813fe308>] sock_def_readable+0x88/0x8d
[<ffffffff81497760>] unix_stream_sendmsg+0x264/0x2ff
[<ffffffff813f83c4>] sock_aio_write+0x112/0x126
[<ffffffff8121cd95>] ? inode_has_perm+0x6a/0x77
[<ffffffff8114093b>] do_sync_write+0xbf/0xff
[<ffffffff81219562>] ? security_file_permission+0x2e/0x33
[<ffffffff81140d71>] ? rw_verify_area+0xb6/0xd3
[<ffffffff81141012>] vfs_write+0xb6/0xf6
[<ffffffff811426a0>] ? fget_light+0x97/0xa2
[<ffffffff81141206>] sys_write+0x4d/0x74
[<ffffffff81078f85>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x1a/0x3a
[<ffffffff814d5c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 23:19 Dave Jones [this message]
2011-07-12 20:20 ` lockdep circular locking error (rcu_node_level_0 vs rq->lock) Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 20:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 22:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-13 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-13 16:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-14 4:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-14 5:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110711231932.GB20367@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.