From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
	by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949674C800A9
	for <poky@yoctoproject.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:19:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
	by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 06:19:22 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,521,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="24890535"
Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.17.183])
	by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 06:19:22 -0700
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: poky@yoctoproject.org
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:19:21 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; )
References: <4E1C32B3.8090708@mlbassoc.com> <4E1C429E.7010506@mlbassoc.com>
	<201107121412.20663.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <201107121412.20663.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201107121419.21197.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: BusyBox features not working
X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion <poky.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/poky>,
	<mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky>
List-Post: <mailto:poky@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky>,
	<mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:19:33 -0000
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tuesday 12 July 2011 14:12:20 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 July 2011 13:48:30 Gary Thomas wrote:
> > Weird.  I just ran through this, first with the default value for
> > DISTRO_FEATURES, then with the same value but 'ipv4' placed at the front
> > of that list.  If 'ipv4' is somewhere in the middle, busybox is not
> > configured correctly.  If it's at the front, it works properly.
> 
> Hmm, a quick test shows that you're right, it doesn't seem to be working as
> expected. Not sure what's going on yet but I will investigate further.

OK, so the answer is it's not fully expanding DISTRO_FEATURES in busybox.inc, 
thus nothing in DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC is found. I'll send a patch to fix this 
(to oe-core).

Thanks for pointing this out!

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre