All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:59:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110712185907.GJ2326@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110712180151.GA18257@dumpdata.com>

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:01:51PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > http://darnok.org/xen/loop_cnt.log
> > > 
> > > which seems to imply that we are indeed stuck in that loop
> > > forever.
> > 
> > It does indeed, thank you!  Also it looks like interrupts are
> > disabled, and that timekeeping is similarly out of action.
> 
> .. With the latest patch the time looks to be advancing.

Sounds like an improvement.  ;-)

> > Disabling CONFIG_NO_HZ would be an interesting test case.
> 
> Hadn't done that yet. Compiling a kernel with "# CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set"
> right now.
> > 
> > > > o	Problems due to portions of the code attempting to use
> > > > 	RCU read-side critical sections while in dyntick-idle mode.
> > > > 	Frederic Weisbecker has located some of these, (though not yet
> > > > 	in Xen) and he has some diagnositics which may be found at:
> > > > 
> > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git
> > > > 
> > > > 	on branch eqscheck.2011.07.08a.
> > > > 
> > > > 	You need to enable CONFIG_PROVE_RCU for these diagnostics to
> > > > 	be executed.
> > > 
> > > Ok, let me try those too.
> > 
> > Thank you!
> 
> Will shortly do this.
> > 
> > > > o	As always, there might be bugs in RCU.  ;-)
> > > > 
> > > > But the loop in task_waking_fair() looks like the most prominent smoking
> > > > gun at the moment.
> > 
> > And could you also please try out the patch that I posted earlier?
> 
> With the previous patch and the .. this is getting confusing. With this patch:
> http://darnok.org/xen/loop_cnt-extra.patch

That is indeed the patch I intended.

> I get this output: http://darnok.org/xen/log.loop_cnt-extra-patch (one guest
> with 4 VCPUS) and http://darnok.org/xen/loop_cnt-extra-patch.log (the guest with 16 VCPUs)

OK, so the infinite loop in task_waking_fair() happens even if RCU callbacks
are deferred until after the scheduler is fully initialized.  Sounds like
one for the scheduler guys.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-12 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-06 21:10 PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3 julie Sullivan
2011-07-06 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 19:31   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 19:47   ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-07 19:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 20:28       ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-07 20:47       ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-08  0:29         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-09 10:09           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10  0:45             ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10  3:25               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 16:38                 ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10 17:16                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 17:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 20:30                       ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10 21:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 21:50                           ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10 23:14                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 16:24                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-11 17:13                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 19:30                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-11 20:15                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 21:09                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 10:55                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 14:12                                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 14:49                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 15:07                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 15:15                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 15:22                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 16:32                                                   ` PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3 - under Xen, 32-bit guest only Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 16:32                                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 16:46                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 16:03                                               ` PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 16:39                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 18:01                                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 18:59                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-07-12 19:07                                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 20:52                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 19:10                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 19:57                                                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 20:46                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 21:04                                                             ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 21:07                                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 20:05                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12  6:33                                     ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2011-07-12  6:33                                       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-07-12 14:05                                       ` [Xen-devel] " Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                               ` <CAAVPGOMSprJSkzziH6hJv9PweOONzsMaRZEK2ZSrV3xFBReTPw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                                 ` <20110711214301.GP2245@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2011-07-12 21:15                                   ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 21:29                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 21:35                                       ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 21:49                                       ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 22:00                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-13  7:18                                           ` RKK
2011-07-13 15:47                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-13 20:57                                           ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-13 21:23                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 17:28 ` julie Sullivan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110712185907.GJ2326@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=kernelmail.jms@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.