From: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: V Srivatsa <vsrivatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Reinhard Buendgen <BUENDGEN@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] makedumpfile: makedumpfile enhancement to filter out kernel data from vmcore
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:40:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110715071029.GA27936@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110715142041.2a7aa858.oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Hi Ken'ichi,
On 2011-07-15 14:20:41 Fri, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> (I'm back to makedumpfile devel for merging this patchset,
> because Tachibana-san is busy.)
Good to see that you are back.
>
> Sorry for replying an old mail.
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 12:26:21 +0530
> Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On 2011-05-26 09:39:23 Thu, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:15:14PM +0200, Reinhard Buendgen wrote:
> > > > Vivek,
> > > >
> > > > I/O is not restricted to disk I/O (it may be network I/O, data sent to
> > > > crtypto cards etc.) and it is not always direct, Device drivers may have
> > > > buffers to which such data is copied.
> > > >
> > > > So it is more than just keys, and it may change over time.
> > > > I do not think hardwiring a filter in makedumpfile is a good idea because
> > > > you would need a new makedumpfile release for every Distribution
> > > > (release).
> > >
> > > Ok, so we are worried about data being in slub/slab caches or driver's
> > > kmalloced buffers etc.
> > >
> > > When do I need access to debuginfo files. I am assuming that makedumpfile
> > > reads them in first kernel sometime and stores relevant info in initramfs.
> > > Otherwise, it is not possible to get to it in second kernel after crash.
> > >
> >
> > The current approach is to re-run the makedumpfile on the crash dump
> > (generated in the second kernel) when we are back into production kernel
> > (1st kernel).
>
> IIUC, there are be 2 dumpfiles on customer site by the above approach.
> The one is with privacy/secret data, and another is without.
Correct.
>
> If correct, I like this approach because a customer can have two options
> when the crash utility cannot read a dumpfile without privacy/secret data
> on support site.
The crash utility would just display a warning message early on during
invocation. Most of the time crash tool will be able to read/analyze the
dump unless someone scrubs out the data on which crash utility is dependant
on. And as I mentioned previously, this is intended just as a security filter
and not to be used as detrimental to crash's analysis of the dump.
>
> First option:
> For digging a problem, a customer sends a dumpfile with privacy/secret
> data to support site.
>
> Second option:
> For protecting privacy/secret data, a customer gives up digging a problem.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Thanks,
-Mahesh.
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
--
Mahesh J Salgaonkar
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 19:59 [PATCH v2 0/8] makedumpfile: makedumpfile enhancement to filter out kernel data from vmcore Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2011-05-18 0:49 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2011-05-24 20:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-24 20:47 ` Dave Anderson
[not found] ` <OF341326C7.0D81F89A-ONC125789B.002DB6ED-C125789B.002FC7A0@de.ibm.com>
2011-05-25 19:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 11:15 ` Reinhard Buendgen
2011-05-26 13:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 6:56 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2011-07-15 5:20 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2011-07-15 7:10 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar [this message]
2011-07-15 7:38 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2011-05-25 7:44 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2011-05-25 18:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-25 19:16 ` Dave Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110715071029.GA27936@in.ibm.com \
--to=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=BUENDGEN@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=vsrivatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.