From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:14:09 +0200 Message-ID: <201107162114.09441.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20110717000815.c83755be9598d34ac8431908@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:59803 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752757Ab1GPTO6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:14:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110717000815.c83755be9598d34ac8431908@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Saturday 16 July 2011 16:08:15 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The pci-current tree lost its build failure. > > The arm-soc tree has complex conflicts against the arm tree so I have > dropped it for today. Sorry about that. I was notified of this before, but didn't get to cleanly redo the tree yet. The problem was that I first tried to merge the for-next branch of the ARM tree into the arm-soc master branch, but I couldn't find\ a way to deal with the arm-soc tree getting rebased. I now plan to start a new arm-soc/for-next branch that will have the same contents but also gets rebased. I'll let you know when I get there. Arnd