All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ibm_newemac: Don't start autonegotiation when disabled in BMCR (genmii)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:59:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107191359.57421.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311075322.25044.418.camel@pasglop>

Hi Ben,

On Tuesday 19 July 2011 13:35:22 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:50 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > As noticed on a custom 440GX board using the Micrel KSZ8041 PHY in
> > fiber mode, a strapped fixed PHY configuration will currently restart
> > the autonegotiation. This patch checks the BMCR_ANENABLE bit and
> > skips this autonegotiation if its disabled.
> 
> Won't that just break aneg on everything else ?
> 
> IE, most other PHYs rely on ANENABLE being set further down this same
> function (especially if the FW doesn't do it but even then, we may reset
> PHYs along the way etc...)

If aneg is enabled for a PHY (e.g. not strapped to fixed configuration), I 
don't see how this patch will change the current aneg behaviour. Perhaps I'm 
missing something, but I tested this on some boards with aneg enabled (Sequoia 
etc). And I didn't notice any problems.
 
> This is something that really a case where the device-tree should
> indicate that aneg shall not be performed and from there don't call
> setup_aneg at all.

I feel that this BMCR_ANENABLE bit should be evaluated, but I have no strong 
preference here. If you prefer that this should be handled via a new dt 
property (phy-aneg = "disabled" ?), I can implement it this way. Just let me 
know.

Thanks,
Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-19 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-19 10:50 [PATCH] net: ibm_newemac: Don't start autonegotiation when disabled in BMCR (genmii) Stefan Roese
2011-07-19 11:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 11:59   ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2011-07-19 12:29     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-20  7:18       ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201107191359.57421.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.