From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] make the sgtl5000-codec work Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:09:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20110719150903.GF9652@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1311004385-14554-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0D324552 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:09:05 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1311004385-14554-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Dong Aisheng , Zeng Zhaoming List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:53:02PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > These are three patches I developed while trying to make the sgtl5000 work on > an mx28evk with the mxs-support provided by Dong Aisheng. The chip used to > lock up before, because a wrong value was written to the power control. > The first patch removes code duplication > The second one is for user-comfort > The third one makes the device work Shouldn't we be restructuring this series so that the last change goes in as a critical bugfix for stable and the other two code cleanups then go on top of it?